COVID-19 challenges and governance response in Russian cities. Insights from Rostov-on-Don

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted serious weaknesses in multilevel governance, especially in urban contexts under authoritarian regimes. This paper explores how federal, regional, and municipal government dynamics influenced pandemic governance and urban resilience in Rostov-on-Don, Russia. Using the oxygen shortage crisis of October 2020 as a point of departure, the study investigates how political priorities shaped public health outcomes, undermined public trust, and reconfigured urban demographic trends. The research draws on policy analysis, media discourse review, and demographic data. Key sources include federal and regional legal documents, local news sources, and statistical data. Media coverage and public responses were categorized by theme, and changes in demographic dynamics were analysed. Findings show that while pandemic management was formally delegated to regional authorities, decision-making closely followed federal directives. The municipal level was limited to operational roles. Policies focused on restriction and enforcement rather than adaptation or care. Public dissatisfaction manifested in protests, black markets for vaccine certificates and permits, and low compliance. Demographically, the pandemic reversed long-standing urban growth, increased mortality—especially among older adults—and altered migration patterns. The case of Rostov-on-Don reveals that urban resilience cannot be achieved where political loyalty overrides local responsiveness. The centralised governance model eroded public trust and exposed the principal-agent problem in the governance system. These findings highlight the importance of governance quality, institutional autonomy, and public trust in building resilient urban systems. • Explores COVID-19 pandemic governance and urban resilience in a Russian city • Urban governance was reduced to operational implementation during the pandemic • Pandemic governance prioritised regime resilience over urban resilience • Public mistrust manifested through low vaccination uptake, protests, and certificate fraud • The pandemic disrupted long-term demographic growth through mortality, low fertility, and migration shifts

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2026.106952
Primary Topic
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COVID-19 challenges and governance response in Russian cities. Insights from Rostov-on-Don

Elena Batunova
Cities
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
article

COVID-19 challenges and governance response in Russian cities. Insights from Rostov-on-Don

Elena Batunova
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted serious weaknesses in multilevel governance, especially in urban contexts under authoritarian regimes. This paper explores how federal, regional, and municipal government dynamics influenced pandemic governance and urban resilience in Rostov-on-Don, Russia. Using the oxygen shortage crisis of October 2020 as a point of departure, the study investigates how political priorities shaped public health outcomes, undermined public trust, and reconfigured urban demographic trends. The research draws on policy analysis, media discourse review, and demographic data. Key sources include federal and regional legal documents, local news sources, and statistical data. Media coverage and public responses were categorized by theme, and changes in demographic dynamics were analysed. Findings show that while pandemic management was formally delegated to regional authorities, decision-making closely followed federal directives. The municipal level was limited to operational roles. Policies focused on restriction and enforcement rather than adaptation or care. Public dissatisfaction manifested in protests, black markets for vaccine certificates and permits, and low compliance. Demographically, the pandemic reversed long-standing urban growth, increased mortality—especially among older adults—and altered migration patterns. The case of Rostov-on-Don reveals that urban resilience cannot be achieved where political loyalty overrides local responsiveness. The centralised governance model eroded public trust and exposed the principal-agent problem in the governance system. These findings highlight the importance of governance quality, institutional autonomy, and public trust in building resilient urban systems. • Explores COVID-19 pandemic governance and urban resilience in a Russian city • Urban governance was reduced to operational implementation during the pandemic • Pandemic governance prioritised regime resilience over urban resilience • Public mistrust manifested through low vaccination uptake, protests, and certificate fraud • The pandemic disrupted long-term demographic growth through mortality, low fertility, and migration shifts

CitiesVol. 173
Shanghai Urban Construction Design and Research Institute (Group) (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.