Impact of educational level on medical students’ ability to learn abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography: a pilot study

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is gaining significant clinical utility; however, limited access to training is a major barrier to its integration into primary care. In this pilot study, we aimed to assess whether educational level influences the ability to acquire skills in performing the abdominal POCUS procedure. In this single-center, prospective, open-label pilot study, 30 medical students (15 undergraduates and 15 residents) participated in a standardized three-step training program consisting of an e-learning module, two simulator-based training sessions, and a practical evaluation. Performance was assessed using an objective structured assessment of technical skills grid and a checklist. The final evaluation scores were compared between the two groups. No significant differences in final scores between the undergraduate and resident groups (objective structured assessment of technical skills: 31.9/40 vs. 31.0/40; Checklist: 32.4/41 vs. 32.3/41) were observed. Both groups showed significant reductions in task completion time and probe movement distance, thereby indicating improved procedural efficiency. These findings suggest that educational level may not significantly influence the ability to learn an abdominal POCUS procedure when using a standardized training program with an ultrasound simulator. Larger studies are required to assess skill retention, learning curves, and the need for refreshing training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09057-2
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of educational level on medical students’ ability to learn abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography: a pilot study

Laurent Fourcade, Jérémy Pasco, Jacques Monteil, Aymeric Rouchaud et al.
BMC Medical Education
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Impact of educational level on medical students’ ability to learn abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography: a pilot study

Laurent Fourcade, Jérémy Pasco, Jacques Monteil, Aymeric Rouchaud, Félix Amiot, Florence Dupriez, Baptiste Borderie
article en

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is gaining significant clinical utility; however, limited access to training is a major barrier to its integration into primary care. In this pilot study, we aimed to assess whether educational level influences the ability to acquire skills in performing the abdominal POCUS procedure. In this single-center, prospective, open-label pilot study, 30 medical students (15 undergraduates and 15 residents) participated in a standardized three-step training program consisting of an e-learning module, two simulator-based training sessions, and a practical evaluation. Performance was assessed using an objective structured assessment of technical skills grid and a checklist. The final evaluation scores were compared between the two groups. No significant differences in final scores between the undergraduate and resident groups (objective structured assessment of technical skills: 31.9/40 vs. 31.0/40; Checklist: 32.4/41 vs. 32.3/41) were observed. Both groups showed significant reductions in task completion time and probe movement distance, thereby indicating improved procedural efficiency. These findings suggest that educational level may not significantly influence the ability to learn an abdominal POCUS procedure when using a standardized training program with an ultrasound simulator. Larger studies are required to assess skill retention, learning curves, and the need for refreshing training.

BMC Medical Education
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Malo (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges (FR), Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin (FR), Université de Limoges (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.