The Epistemology of Code in the Age of Machine Learning

Code is an epistemic system predicated on the repression of state, but with the rise of global optimization and machine learning algorithms, code functions just as much to obscure knowledge as to reveal it. Code is constructed in response to two characteristics of the twentieth century episteme. First, knowledge is represented as a process. Second, this representation must be sufficient, such that its meaning is constituted by the representational form itself. In attempting to meet these requirements, process is separated into an essential part, code, and an inessential part, state. Although code has a relationship with state, in order to construct code as an epistemic object, state is limited and suppressed. This construction begins with the first formation of code in the 1940s and reaches its modern form in the structured programming movement of the later 1960s. But now, with the increasing dominance of global optimization and machine learning algorithms in computing, it has become apparent that state is vitally important, and yet our tools for understanding state are inadequate. This epistemic inadequacy nevertheless serves those who would act dangerously and shun responsibility for the consequences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital humanities quarterly
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63744/mtgy4d9qn78k
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Epistemology of Code in the Age of Machine Learning

Evan Buswell
Digital humanities quarterly
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
article

The Epistemology of Code in the Age of Machine Learning

Evan Buswell
article en

Abstract

Code is an epistemic system predicated on the repression of state, but with the rise of global optimization and machine learning algorithms, code functions just as much to obscure knowledge as to reveal it. Code is constructed in response to two characteristics of the twentieth century episteme. First, knowledge is represented as a process. Second, this representation must be sufficient, such that its meaning is constituted by the representational form itself. In attempting to meet these requirements, process is separated into an essential part, code, and an inessential part, state. Although code has a relationship with state, in order to construct code as an epistemic object, state is limited and suppressed. This construction begins with the first formation of code in the 1940s and reaches its modern form in the structured programming movement of the later 1960s. But now, with the increasing dominance of global optimization and machine learning algorithms in computing, it has become apparent that state is vitally important, and yet our tools for understanding state are inadequate. This epistemic inadequacy nevertheless serves those who would act dangerously and shun responsibility for the consequences.

Digital humanities quarterlyVol. 19(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Epistemology of Code in the Age of Machine Learning — Evan Buswell · Digital humanities quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS