From Individual Intentionality to the Big Other: An Emergentist Model of Social Ontology

This paper proposes an emergentist model of social ontology that resolves a long-standing explanatory stalemate between methodological individualism and holism. Rather than treating social order as either an aggregate of isolated intentions or a mysterious collective subject, it argues that individual intentionality can, under conditions of interaction, coordination, and institutionalization, generate a normative structure that becomes causally efficacious at the social level. This structure—identified here as the Big Other—operates through constitutive emergence, formal causation, and feedback-driven norm maintenance. The model explains how norms persist, guide practice, and sometimes shift abruptly at tipping points, while remaining compatible with physical causal closure. By showing how social forms can be both emergent and explanatory, the paper offers a naturalized framework that bridges methodological individualism and holism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19136259
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Individual Intentionality to the Big Other: An Emergentist Model of Social Ontology

Guan-Ru Chen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Critical Realism in Sociology
article

From Individual Intentionality to the Big Other: An Emergentist Model of Social Ontology

Guan-Ru Chen
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes an emergentist model of social ontology that resolves a long-standing explanatory stalemate between methodological individualism and holism. Rather than treating social order as either an aggregate of isolated intentions or a mysterious collective subject, it argues that individual intentionality can, under conditions of interaction, coordination, and institutionalization, generate a normative structure that becomes causally efficacious at the social level. This structure—identified here as the Big Other—operates through constitutive emergence, formal causation, and feedback-driven norm maintenance. The model explains how norms persist, guide practice, and sometimes shift abruptly at tipping points, while remaining compatible with physical causal closure. By showing how social forms can be both emergent and explanatory, the paper offers a naturalized framework that bridges methodological individualism and holism.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.