Views and experiences regarding workplace genetic testing: findings from a national survey of U.S. employees

The emergence of voluntary health-related genetic testing in workplace wellness programs indicates a need to understand employees’ views and experiences regarding workplace genetic testing (wGT). A large, diverse national sample of employed adults (N=2000; median age=43 years; 51.1% female; 33% non-white) completed a web survey of their wGT views and experiences. Although 80% of participants indicated their employer did not offer wGT, 54.1% were interested in testing, especially (somewhat/very) for cancer (89.2%), heart disease (93.1%), and Alzheimer’s disease (85.3%). Characteristics associated with wGT interest included younger age (<55 years), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, genetic testing experience or familiarity, and a positive family medical history (all p<0.05). Reasons for pursuing wGT (e.g., inform health behaviors) were endorsed more frequently than reasons for declining (e.g., insurance/employability concerns). Among participants offered wGT (20%), 60% indicated having undergone testing. Test uptake was associated with personal medical history, greater familiarity with genetic testing, and self-reported physical health (all p<0.05). A minority of employed adults surveyed reported being offered, or having had, wGT. Nevertheless, many employees are potentially interested in wGT, particularly for common diseases. Although employees have wGT concerns, many view it as beneficial to inform health behaviors and decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community Genetics
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00856-6
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Views and experiences regarding workplace genetic testing: findings from a national survey of U.S. employees

Rebecca Ferber, Wendy R. Uhlmann, Drew Blasco, Elizabeth Charnysh et al.
Journal of Community Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Views and experiences regarding workplace genetic testing: findings from a national survey of U.S. employees

Rebecca Ferber, Wendy R. Uhlmann, Drew Blasco, Elizabeth Charnysh, Sarah McCain, Charles Lee, Subhamoy Pal, Kunal Sanghavi, J. Scott Roberts, Anya E.R. Prince
article en

Abstract

The emergence of voluntary health-related genetic testing in workplace wellness programs indicates a need to understand employees’ views and experiences regarding workplace genetic testing (wGT). A large, diverse national sample of employed adults (N=2000; median age=43 years; 51.1% female; 33% non-white) completed a web survey of their wGT views and experiences. Although 80% of participants indicated their employer did not offer wGT, 54.1% were interested in testing, especially (somewhat/very) for cancer (89.2%), heart disease (93.1%), and Alzheimer’s disease (85.3%). Characteristics associated with wGT interest included younger age (<55 years), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, genetic testing experience or familiarity, and a positive family medical history (all p<0.05). Reasons for pursuing wGT (e.g., inform health behaviors) were endorsed more frequently than reasons for declining (e.g., insurance/employability concerns). Among participants offered wGT (20%), 60% indicated having undergone testing. Test uptake was associated with personal medical history, greater familiarity with genetic testing, and self-reported physical health (all p<0.05). A minority of employed adults surveyed reported being offered, or having had, wGT. Nevertheless, many employees are potentially interested in wGT, particularly for common diseases. Although employees have wGT concerns, many view it as beneficial to inform health behaviors and decisions.

Journal of Community GeneticsVol. 17(2)
University of Iowa (US), University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US), Jackson Laboratory (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.