D. 1, 3, 28 (Paul. 5 ad legem Iuliam et Papiam) – Retroactive interpretation and the leges Iulia et Papia Poppaea

Among different forms of retroactivity and their regulation, retroactive interpretation was one of the forms that have been already mentioned in Roman law. Apart from the Justinian’s Novels, which provided specifically for the authentic (retroactive) interpretation, retroactive interpretation is expressly dealt with in the D. 1, 3, 28 (Paul. 5 ad legem Iuliam et Papiam). This very short fragment is a part of the title on the sources of law; however, it stands out among the other opinions selected to represent principles of the interpretation, prescribing the use of more recent laws in the interpretation of those preceding them. In this paper we shall try to clarify the original meaning of this statement, with reference to its original subject matter, lex or better said leges Iulia et Papia (Poppaea), the Roman family legislation with important repercussions in the field of succession law, i.e. in the form of the introduction of escheated property (bona caduca). It is discussed the temporal argument in the Paul’s commentary regarding the sequence of two acts and its specific goals. Furthermore, it is pointed to the Justinian’s legislation abrogating the rules on bona caduca and how it might help in possibly offering some more specific background for this rule.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Classical Studies and Legal History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D. 1, 3, 28 (Paul. 5 ad legem Iuliam et Papiam) – Retroactive interpretation and the leges Iulia et Papia Poppaea

Tomislav Karlović, Lara Šmic
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Classical Studies and Legal History
article

D. 1, 3, 28 (Paul. 5 ad legem Iuliam et Papiam) – Retroactive interpretation and the leges Iulia et Papia Poppaea

Tomislav Karlović, Lara Šmic
article en

Abstract

Among different forms of retroactivity and their regulation, retroactive interpretation was one of the forms that have been already mentioned in Roman law. Apart from the Justinian’s Novels, which provided specifically for the authentic (retroactive) interpretation, retroactive interpretation is expressly dealt with in the D. 1, 3, 28 (Paul. 5 ad legem Iuliam et Papiam). This very short fragment is a part of the title on the sources of law; however, it stands out among the other opinions selected to represent principles of the interpretation, prescribing the use of more recent laws in the interpretation of those preceding them. In this paper we shall try to clarify the original meaning of this statement, with reference to its original subject matter, lex or better said leges Iulia et Papia (Poppaea), the Roman family legislation with important repercussions in the field of succession law, i.e. in the form of the introduction of escheated property (bona caduca). It is discussed the temporal argument in the Paul’s commentary regarding the sequence of two acts and its specific goals. Furthermore, it is pointed to the Justinian’s legislation abrogating the rules on bona caduca and how it might help in possibly offering some more specific background for this rule.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Zagreb (HR), Opća Bolnica Varaždin (HR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Classical Studies and Legal History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.