The Advocate's Role In Indonesia's Anti-MoneyLaundering Regime: A Game Theory Analysis

In the Anti-Money Laundering framework, Advocates will engage directly with the Client's interests. The rights of clients that professionals are obligated to protect may conflict with their required duties. In this context, professionals are positioned within the framework of the prisoner's dilemma as a part of game theory. This strategy delineates the method by which professionals adeptly address challenges associated with clients and legal obligations. It is a conceptual article that employs the qualitative legal research methodology to examine this issue and provide a proposed solution. The research process begins by evaluating the Advocate's involvement in the regime's anti-money laundering initiatives and the implications of the Advocate's compliance for both the profession and the Nation, beyond just the client. As a result, professionals must prioritise the protection of their "officium Nobile" and uphold their dignity in accordance with ethical standards through consistent implementation of the obligations as a reporting party in the Anti-Money Laundering Law. The design of compliance is crucial from the perspective of business rules for both the client and the opposing positions. The participation of an advocate in money laundering activities may jeopardise the client and their business. The reverse condition applies if the client poses a danger to the Advocate. This article analyses the Advocate's participation in two roles based on qualitative research: first, as a professional representing clients, and second, as a professional adhering to rules, regulations, and International Standards. Money laundering in advanced societies requires heightened societal involvement and spans across all professional sectors.