Enhancing the Health of NHS Staff:eTHOS - a randomised controlled pilot trial of an employee health screening clinic for NHS staff compared with usual care to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism

Background<br/>Staff sickness absence incurs high costs to the NHS and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Mental and musculoskeletal ill-health are the main causes, with cardiovascular risk factors also common. We tested the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a staff health screening clinic (SHSC) in reducing sickness absenteeism and presenteeism.<br/><br/>Methods<br/>Individually randomised controlled pilot trial of a SHSC compared with usual care recruiting employees from four English NHS hospitals. Those in the intervention arm were assessed by a nurse using electronic database-driven screening for musculoskeletal, mental and cardiovascular health. Screen positives were given advice and/or referral to services according to UK guidelines. Three co-primary outcomes formed the stop-go criteria: recruitment, referrals, and attendance at referred services. Secondary outcomes included: generalisability, screening results, individual referrals required/attended, health behaviours, acceptability/feasibility of processes, indication of contamination, costs, health-related quality of life, self-reported and employee records of absenteeism. Process evaluation included interviews with participants, intervention delivery staff and service providers. Quantitative analyses used descriptive statistics with framework analysis for qualitative data. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, follow-up was restricted to 6 months and acceptance of referral during the screening assessment used as proxy for attendance.<br/><br/>Results<br/>Despite recruitment rates during the truncated timeframe indicating potential to reach target, the final proportion recruited of 314 consented/3788 invited (8.3%) was lower than anticipated, and those recruited were not fully representative of the hospital staff population. 236/314 were randomised. Of 118 allocated to the intervention arm, screening identified 57 (48.3%) eligible for referral, with 18 (31.6%) accepting the referral. Process evaluation demonstrated that the electronic database-driven screening intervention and data collection system was efficient, promoting good fidelity. The intervention could benefit from more personalisation, better understanding of local context, longer training and better integration with referral services.<br/><br/>Conclusions<br/>We have identified clinical need and perceived benefit for a SHSC. Delivery was feasible and electronic data capture successful. The three stop/go criteria were red (recruitment), green (referral) and amber (attendance), therefore the Trial Oversight Committee recommended that a full-scale trial should proceed, but with modifications to adapt to local context and adopt processes to engage better with underserved communities.<br/><br/>Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN10237475, registered 09/12/2019, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10237475.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Published
2026-02-22
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the Health of NHS Staff:eTHOS - a randomised controlled pilot trial of an employee health screening clinic for NHS staff compared with usual care to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism

Sarah Tearne, Gareth Walters, Chris Poyner, Nicola R Heneghan et al.
University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Enhancing the Health of NHS Staff:eTHOS - a randomised controlled pilot trial of an employee health screening clinic for NHS staff compared with usual care to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism

Sarah Tearne, Gareth Walters, Chris Poyner, Nicola R Heneghan, Hugh Rickards, Steven Sadhra, Ciara Harris, Margaret O'Hara, Pollyanna Hardy, Florence Edwards, Lucy Cooper, Kate; id_orcid 0000-0002-6224-2115 Jolly, Elizabeth; id_orcid 0000-0003-3454-5482 Sapey, Kiran Rai, Tom; id_orcid 0000-0001-9277-5214 Marshall, Sheriden Bevan, Peymané; id_orcid 0000-0001-9087-3945 Adab, Ingrid DuRand, Alisha; id_orcid 0000-0002-9738-2935 Maher, Natalie; id_orcid 0000-0002-1664-7541 Rowland, Sue; id_orcid 0000-0001-8936-3745 Jowett, Rachel E; id_orcid 0000-0002-0747-6883 Jordan, Rachel; id_orcid 0000-0002-1798-3854 Adams, Timothy; id_orcid 0000-0002-6873-0750 Barrett
article en

Abstract

Background<br/>Staff sickness absence incurs high costs to the NHS and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. Mental and musculoskeletal ill-health are the main causes, with cardiovascular risk factors also common. We tested the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a staff health screening clinic (SHSC) in reducing sickness absenteeism and presenteeism.<br/><br/>Methods<br/>Individually randomised controlled pilot trial of a SHSC compared with usual care recruiting employees from four English NHS hospitals. Those in the intervention arm were assessed by a nurse using electronic database-driven screening for musculoskeletal, mental and cardiovascular health. Screen positives were given advice and/or referral to services according to UK guidelines. Three co-primary outcomes formed the stop-go criteria: recruitment, referrals, and attendance at referred services. Secondary outcomes included: generalisability, screening results, individual referrals required/attended, health behaviours, acceptability/feasibility of processes, indication of contamination, costs, health-related quality of life, self-reported and employee records of absenteeism. Process evaluation included interviews with participants, intervention delivery staff and service providers. Quantitative analyses used descriptive statistics with framework analysis for qualitative data. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, follow-up was restricted to 6 months and acceptance of referral during the screening assessment used as proxy for attendance.<br/><br/>Results<br/>Despite recruitment rates during the truncated timeframe indicating potential to reach target, the final proportion recruited of 314 consented/3788 invited (8.3%) was lower than anticipated, and those recruited were not fully representative of the hospital staff population. 236/314 were randomised. Of 118 allocated to the intervention arm, screening identified 57 (48.3%) eligible for referral, with 18 (31.6%) accepting the referral. Process evaluation demonstrated that the electronic database-driven screening intervention and data collection system was efficient, promoting good fidelity. The intervention could benefit from more personalisation, better understanding of local context, longer training and better integration with referral services.<br/><br/>Conclusions<br/>We have identified clinical need and perceived benefit for a SHSC. Delivery was feasible and electronic data capture successful. The three stop/go criteria were red (recruitment), green (referral) and amber (attendance), therefore the Trial Oversight Committee recommended that a full-scale trial should proceed, but with modifications to adapt to local context and adopt processes to engage better with underserved communities.<br/><br/>Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN10237475, registered 09/12/2019, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10237475.

University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.