Efficacy and safety of Qiliqiangxin capsule for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and purpose: Heart failure (HF) is a global chronic disease that significantly impacts patients’ quality of life and imposes substantial health burdens. Therapeutic strategies for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have advanced rapidly. However, conventional pharmacological treatments remain limited by clinical drawbacks. Traditional Chinese medicine, particularly Qiliqiangxin capsule (QLQX), has emerged as a promising complementary approach in China. To date, a comprehensive and updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of QLQX for HFrEF is lacking. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of QLQX in treating patients with HFrEF. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to the latest available date. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager Software 5.4 and Stata 16.0. Results: A total of 40 studies involving 7,367 patients were included. Compared with conventional Western medicine (CWM) alone, QLQX combined with CWM significantly improved New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (risk ratio [RR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.16–1.29; P < 0.05) and 6-minute walking distance (mean differences [MD]: 58.40, 95% CI: 45.52–71.28; P < 0.05). Additionally, QLQX significantly reduced rehospitalization rates (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67–0.90; P < 0.05) and N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (MD: −276.04, 95% CI: −348.49 to −203.59; P < 0.05). Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed in some outcomes. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses identified treatment duration and sex differences as potential sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: QLQX combined with CWM appears to be an effective and safe adjunctive therapy for improving clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Although these findings provide supportive evidence, further large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results and inform clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology Plus
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cp9.0000000000000152
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of Qiliqiangxin capsule for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ziqi Chen, Xuetao Zhu, Yiyang Fu, G H Ni et al.
Cardiology Plus
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Efficacy and safety of Qiliqiangxin capsule for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ziqi Chen, Xuetao Zhu, Yiyang Fu, G H Ni, I Cheang, Yanli Zhou, Qiang Qu, Xinli Li, Haifeng Zhang, Aijing Zhu
article en

Abstract

Background and purpose: Heart failure (HF) is a global chronic disease that significantly impacts patients’ quality of life and imposes substantial health burdens. Therapeutic strategies for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have advanced rapidly. However, conventional pharmacological treatments remain limited by clinical drawbacks. Traditional Chinese medicine, particularly Qiliqiangxin capsule (QLQX), has emerged as a promising complementary approach in China. To date, a comprehensive and updated systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of QLQX for HFrEF is lacking. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of QLQX in treating patients with HFrEF. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to the latest available date. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager Software 5.4 and Stata 16.0. Results: A total of 40 studies involving 7,367 patients were included. Compared with conventional Western medicine (CWM) alone, QLQX combined with CWM significantly improved New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (risk ratio [RR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.16–1.29; P < 0.05) and 6-minute walking distance (mean differences [MD]: 58.40, 95% CI: 45.52–71.28; P < 0.05). Additionally, QLQX significantly reduced rehospitalization rates (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67–0.90; P < 0.05) and N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (MD: −276.04, 95% CI: −348.49 to −203.59; P < 0.05). Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed in some outcomes. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses identified treatment duration and sex differences as potential sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: QLQX combined with CWM appears to be an effective and safe adjunctive therapy for improving clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF. Although these findings provide supportive evidence, further large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results and inform clinical practice.

Cardiology Plus
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.