COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY, COGNITIVE FUNCTION AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND INSTITUTIONALISED ELDERLY IN SUBURBAN

Background: Aging is a universal process that often leads to shifts in living arrangements, such as moving to old age homes due to urbanisation and changing family structures. Objective: To compare functional mobility, cognitive function, and quality of life (QoL) between community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly in a suburban area. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 66 participants (aged 65+) from Thane City. Assessment tools included the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and SF-12 form. Results:Institutionalised elderly showed significantly higher rates of mobility dependency (72.7%) compared to community-dwelling elderly (36.4%, p=0.012). Severe cognitive impairment was also more prevalent in old age homes (66.7%) than in those living with family (42.4%, p=0.043). Quality of life was markedly lower in the institutionalised group (81.8% below average) compared to the community group (p=0.013). Conclusion: Elderly individuals living with family experience better physical, cognitive, and emotional well-being compared to those in institutional care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19085657
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY, COGNITIVE FUNCTION AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND INSTITUTIONALISED ELDERLY IN SUBURBAN

Supriya Dhumale2 Khatija Hanif Memon1*
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Health and Well-being Studies
article

COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY, COGNITIVE FUNCTION AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND INSTITUTIONALISED ELDERLY IN SUBURBAN

Supriya Dhumale2 Khatija Hanif Memon1*
article en

Abstract

Background: Aging is a universal process that often leads to shifts in living arrangements, such as moving to old age homes due to urbanisation and changing family structures. Objective: To compare functional mobility, cognitive function, and quality of life (QoL) between community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly in a suburban area. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 66 participants (aged 65+) from Thane City. Assessment tools included the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and SF-12 form. Results:Institutionalised elderly showed significantly higher rates of mobility dependency (72.7%) compared to community-dwelling elderly (36.4%, p=0.012). Severe cognitive impairment was also more prevalent in old age homes (66.7%) than in those living with family (42.4%, p=0.043). Quality of life was markedly lower in the institutionalised group (81.8% below average) compared to the community group (p=0.013). Conclusion: Elderly individuals living with family experience better physical, cognitive, and emotional well-being compared to those in institutional care.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY, COGNITIVE FUNCTION AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND INSTITUTIONALISED ELDERLY IN SUBURBAN — Supriya Dhumale2 Khatija Hanif Memon1* · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS