Which implant for Pauwels type 2 femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical study

Objective: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) in young patients are relatively rare but can lead to severe complications if not treated appropriately. Pauwels type 2 fractures, characterized by moderate inclination, require surgical stabilization. However, no consensus exists regarding the optimal implant that provides superior biomechanical stability. This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of 3 different fixation systems for the surgical treatment of Pauwels type 2 FNF. Methods: A total of 21 bovine femurs of similar age and size were selected and divided into 3 fixation groups: dynamic hip screw (DHS), cannulated screws (CS), and major plate (MP). Each specimen underwent axial compression testing to assess the maximum load-bearing capacity, shear force resistance, and deformation characteristics of the fixation methods. Results: The results showed that the CS group exhibited the highest shear stress resistance, followed by the DHS group, while the MP group showed significantly lower mechanical strength and elongation (P < .05). Although DHS provided substantial stability, CS demonstrated superior overall mechanical performance. In contrast, the MP system showed significantly lower resistance compared to the other 2 fixation methods. Conclusion: This biomechanical study highlights the importance of implant selection in the management of Pauwels type 2 FNF. Although previous investigations have questioned the adequacy of CS fixation in highly unstable Pauwels type 3 fractures, the results suggest that CS may be a reliable and effective option for the relatively more stable Pauwels type 2 pattern. Because the tests were performed on bovine femur models, which do not fully reflect the structural characteristics of human bone, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further biomechanical studies using human cadaveric specimens are required to confirm the applicability of these results to clinical practice. Cite this article as: Aydın O, Kazez M, Say Y, Belhan O. Which implant for Pauwels type 2 femoral neck fractures: A biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2026; 60(1), 0345, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.25345.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2026.25345
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which implant for Pauwels type 2 femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical study

Oğuz Uğur Aydın, Yakup Say, Oktay Belhan, Muhammed Kazez
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Which implant for Pauwels type 2 femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical study

Oğuz Uğur Aydın, Yakup Say, Oktay Belhan, Muhammed Kazez
article en

Abstract

Objective: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) in young patients are relatively rare but can lead to severe complications if not treated appropriately. Pauwels type 2 fractures, characterized by moderate inclination, require surgical stabilization. However, no consensus exists regarding the optimal implant that provides superior biomechanical stability. This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of 3 different fixation systems for the surgical treatment of Pauwels type 2 FNF. Methods: A total of 21 bovine femurs of similar age and size were selected and divided into 3 fixation groups: dynamic hip screw (DHS), cannulated screws (CS), and major plate (MP). Each specimen underwent axial compression testing to assess the maximum load-bearing capacity, shear force resistance, and deformation characteristics of the fixation methods. Results: The results showed that the CS group exhibited the highest shear stress resistance, followed by the DHS group, while the MP group showed significantly lower mechanical strength and elongation (P < .05). Although DHS provided substantial stability, CS demonstrated superior overall mechanical performance. In contrast, the MP system showed significantly lower resistance compared to the other 2 fixation methods. Conclusion: This biomechanical study highlights the importance of implant selection in the management of Pauwels type 2 FNF. Although previous investigations have questioned the adequacy of CS fixation in highly unstable Pauwels type 3 fractures, the results suggest that CS may be a reliable and effective option for the relatively more stable Pauwels type 2 pattern. Because the tests were performed on bovine femur models, which do not fully reflect the structural characteristics of human bone, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further biomechanical studies using human cadaveric specimens are required to confirm the applicability of these results to clinical practice. Cite this article as: Aydın O, Kazez M, Say Y, Belhan O. Which implant for Pauwels type 2 femoral neck fractures: A biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2026; 60(1), 0345, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.25345.

Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica TurcicaVol. 60(2)
Turku University Hospital (FI), Turku City Hospital (FI), Munzur University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.