The CMIP6-downscaled CORDEX-Southeast Asia (SEA) ensemble: evaluation and benchmarking for megacities of SEA

Abstract. A 21-member ensemble of regional climate simulations has been produced for Southeast Asia (SEA) by dynamically downscaling Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Global Climate Models (GCMs) under the World Climate Research Programme's Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX). The ensemble was generated by several modelling institutes using three regional climate models (RCMs) with eight distinct model configurations, resulting in a total of 62 simulations spanning the historical period and multiple future emissions scenarios. Model performance for mean, daily maximum/minimum temperature, and precipitation was evaluated against multiple observations at annual, seasonal, and daily time scales over SEA and its two subregions: Mainland and Maritime Continent (MC). Despite large observational uncertainties in precipitation intensity, the CMIP6 CORDEX-SEA ensemble captures the spatial and seasonal rainfall distribution reasonably well but tends to substantially overestimate observed rainfall. Wet biases, evident in about two-thirds of the models, are regionally and seasonally heterogeneous and larger over monsoon-dominated regions and seasons (e.g., MC during November–April and the Mainland during May–October). All RCMs showed widespread, statistically significant cold biases in daily mean temperature, which were largest during boreal winter, over the Mainland, and in simulations that have significant wet biases. These cold biases primarily arise from the models' underestimation of daily maximum temperature. The MC remains a challenging region since models struggle to accurately capture the spatial variability of rainfall and the internal variability of temperature. A standardised benchmarking framework was applied to precipitation and temperature, which ultimately identified 15 historical simulations that met our a priori model performance expectations. Analysing the range of future projections and model independence shows that simulations from the same RCM family exhibit similar bias structures, highlighting the importance of RCM setup and the selection of statistically independent models. From this process, eight simulations spanning three RCM configurations were selected for further kilometre-scale dynamical downscaling over megacities of SEA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2026-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7653-2026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The CMIP6-downscaled CORDEX-Southeast Asia (SEA) ensemble: evaluation and benchmarking for megacities of SEA

L. J. Alexander, Donaldi Sukma Permana, Jing Xiang Chung, Fredolin Tangang et al.
1 citations
Geoscientific model development
Climate variability and models
5.25
article

The CMIP6-downscaled CORDEX-Southeast Asia (SEA) ensemble: evaluation and benchmarking for megacities of SEA

L. J. Alexander, Donaldi Sukma Permana, Jing Xiang Chung, Fredolin Tangang, Marcus Thatcher, Grace Redmond, T Ngo-Duc, Ummu Ma’rufah, Jennifer Tibay, Phuong Loan Nguyen, Jerasorn Santisirisomboon, Son C. H. Truong, Tan Phan-Van, Giovanni Di Virgilio, Faye Cruz, Tse Wai Po, Julie Mae Dado, Long Trinh-Tuan, Liew Juneng, Stephen White, John L. McGregor
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. A 21-member ensemble of regional climate simulations has been produced for Southeast Asia (SEA) by dynamically downscaling Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) Global Climate Models (GCMs) under the World Climate Research Programme's Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX). The ensemble was generated by several modelling institutes using three regional climate models (RCMs) with eight distinct model configurations, resulting in a total of 62 simulations spanning the historical period and multiple future emissions scenarios. Model performance for mean, daily maximum/minimum temperature, and precipitation was evaluated against multiple observations at annual, seasonal, and daily time scales over SEA and its two subregions: Mainland and Maritime Continent (MC). Despite large observational uncertainties in precipitation intensity, the CMIP6 CORDEX-SEA ensemble captures the spatial and seasonal rainfall distribution reasonably well but tends to substantially overestimate observed rainfall. Wet biases, evident in about two-thirds of the models, are regionally and seasonally heterogeneous and larger over monsoon-dominated regions and seasons (e.g., MC during November–April and the Mainland during May–October). All RCMs showed widespread, statistically significant cold biases in daily mean temperature, which were largest during boreal winter, over the Mainland, and in simulations that have significant wet biases. These cold biases primarily arise from the models' underestimation of daily maximum temperature. The MC remains a challenging region since models struggle to accurately capture the spatial variability of rainfall and the internal variability of temperature. A standardised benchmarking framework was applied to precipitation and temperature, which ultimately identified 15 historical simulations that met our a priori model performance expectations. Analysing the range of future projections and model independence shows that simulations from the same RCM family exhibit similar bias structures, highlighting the importance of RCM setup and the selection of statistically independent models. From this process, eight simulations spanning three RCM configurations were selected for further kilometre-scale dynamical downscaling over megacities of SEA.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 19(16)
Met Office (GB), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (MY), Universiti Brunei Darussalam (BN), Ateneo de Manila University (PH), Meteorological, Climatological, And Geophysical Agency (ID), UNSW Sydney (AU), Health Sciences and Nutrition (AU), Hong Kong Observatory (CN), Manila Observatory (PH), Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (AU), National Institute of Meteorology (TN), Ramkhamhaeng University (TH), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VN), National University of Malaysia (MY), Hanoi University of Science and Technology (VN)
Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research, National Foundation for Science and Technology Development, National Computational Infrastructure, University of New South Wales, Australian Research Council, National Cancer Institute
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate variability and models
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.