Nurses’ Perception of Professional Peer-to-Peer Feedback

Clinical nurse peer-to-peer feedback is vital for patient care improvement and achieving Magnet designation, yet evidence is limited about nurses' perceptions of peer feedback related to autonomous practice, perceived quality, and patient safety. The study aims to understand inpatient clinical nurses' perception of the peer feedback process related to perceived quality of care, patient safety, and autonomy. In 2021, a descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study using an online peer feedback survey was conducted on clinical nurses across three inpatient hospitals within a Southern California integrated healthcare system. The data were analyzed using descriptive, comparative, correlational, and regression statistics. N = 457 clinical nurses voluntarily participated. Regression analysis demonstrated that nurses' comfort in giving and receiving peer feedback contributes to the following dependent variable outcomes: Autonomous practice (R2 = 0.208, F (2,452) = 60.447, p < .001); patient care quality (R2 = 0.130, F (2,453) = 32.515, p < .001); and patient safety (R2= 0.035, F (2,419) = 8.066, p < .001). The study outcomes validate the predictive value of nurses' perceived comfort in giving and receiving peer feedback on nurse autonomy, quality, and patient safety. The findings reinforce the need for healthcare leaders to strengthen organizational structures and processes supporting peer feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Administration Quarterly
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/naq.0000000000000725
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nurses’ Perception of Professional Peer-to-Peer Feedback

Juli McGinnis, Quincyann Tsai, Peggy Kalowes, Regina M. Valdez et al.
Nursing Administration Quarterly
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Nurses’ Perception of Professional Peer-to-Peer Feedback

Juli McGinnis, Quincyann Tsai, Peggy Kalowes, Regina M. Valdez, Emma Aquino-Maneja, June Rondinelli, Maria Lourdes Ngugi, Kevin Scott Wilbur, Janet Gichau
article en

Abstract

Clinical nurse peer-to-peer feedback is vital for patient care improvement and achieving Magnet designation, yet evidence is limited about nurses' perceptions of peer feedback related to autonomous practice, perceived quality, and patient safety. The study aims to understand inpatient clinical nurses' perception of the peer feedback process related to perceived quality of care, patient safety, and autonomy. In 2021, a descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study using an online peer feedback survey was conducted on clinical nurses across three inpatient hospitals within a Southern California integrated healthcare system. The data were analyzed using descriptive, comparative, correlational, and regression statistics. N = 457 clinical nurses voluntarily participated. Regression analysis demonstrated that nurses' comfort in giving and receiving peer feedback contributes to the following dependent variable outcomes: Autonomous practice (R2 = 0.208, F (2,452) = 60.447, p < .001); patient care quality (R2 = 0.130, F (2,453) = 32.515, p < .001); and patient safety (R2= 0.035, F (2,419) = 8.066, p < .001). The study outcomes validate the predictive value of nurses' perceived comfort in giving and receiving peer feedback on nurse autonomy, quality, and patient safety. The findings reinforce the need for healthcare leaders to strengthen organizational structures and processes supporting peer feedback.

Nursing Administration QuarterlyVol. 50(2)
West Los Angeles College (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), VA West Los Angeles Medical Center (US), Link Consulting (PT), Panorama Research (United States) (US), Azusa Pacific University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.