A Qualitative Examination of Character Strengths and Virtues in Intergroup Reconciliation

This paper argues that the VIA Classification of Strengths and Virtues (Peterson & Seligman, 2004) provides a useful foundation for Character Education (CE) generally and an effective common language for the understanding of Reconciliation specifically. It presents recent literature examining the prototypical elements of CE (McGrath, 2018), and the application of the VIA Classification to the study of peace and inter-group conflict (Niemiec, 2022). It then goes on to report seven interviews with experienced practitioners working in three reconciliation centres (Rose Castle Foundation; the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation; and Reconcilers Together), located in the United Kingdom, Canada, Egypt, and Belgium. Qualitative analysis of the data yielded 14 themes, and 32 sub-themes or codes, related to the use of Character Strengths in the work of reconciliation. While the participants represented different approaches to the reconciliation process, their ability to easily identify constructs from the VIA Classification in the practice of reconciliation supports the usefulness of the VIA nomenclature in providing a common language for both the understanding of and educating for reconciliation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Character Education
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jced-12-2024-0003
Primary Topic
Values and Moral Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Examination of Character Strengths and Virtues in Intergroup Reconciliation

Roger Bretherton, Victoria Ackford
Journal of Character Education
Values and Moral Education
article

A Qualitative Examination of Character Strengths and Virtues in Intergroup Reconciliation

Roger Bretherton, Victoria Ackford
article en

Abstract

This paper argues that the VIA Classification of Strengths and Virtues (Peterson & Seligman, 2004) provides a useful foundation for Character Education (CE) generally and an effective common language for the understanding of Reconciliation specifically. It presents recent literature examining the prototypical elements of CE (McGrath, 2018), and the application of the VIA Classification to the study of peace and inter-group conflict (Niemiec, 2022). It then goes on to report seven interviews with experienced practitioners working in three reconciliation centres (Rose Castle Foundation; the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation; and Reconcilers Together), located in the United Kingdom, Canada, Egypt, and Belgium. Qualitative analysis of the data yielded 14 themes, and 32 sub-themes or codes, related to the use of Character Strengths in the work of reconciliation. While the participants represented different approaches to the reconciliation process, their ability to easily identify constructs from the VIA Classification in the practice of reconciliation supports the usefulness of the VIA nomenclature in providing a common language for both the understanding of and educating for reconciliation.

Journal of Character EducationVol. 20(2)
University of Lincoln (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Values and Moral Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.