Using Card-Sorting to Determine Information Requirements for Remote Operators of High-Level Automated Vehicles

High-level connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) may encounter edge cases which require a human to intervene remotely, particularly during the initial implementation and deployment. The nature of these interventions will vary, demanding different operator tasks and competencies—and, in turn, distinct information requirements (IRs). We present an empirically derived, prioritised classification of IRs for remote operators of high-level automated vehicles and translate these into actionable interface design guidance. Seventy potential IRs were initially collated based on established use cases and supporting literature. Following iterative refinement, 39 IRs were evaluated in a card sorting exercise, in which 20 participants (recruited as pairs) were presented with two remote operation use-cases (taken from ten possible use-cases) and asked to group and prioritise the cards—each showing a different information requirement. Two hundred and sixty-five categories were initially generated. These were subsequently refined using cluster analysis (similarity matrices, dendrograms) and verified using inductive thematic analysis, resulting in eleven distinct classifications: Occupant Information; CAV Interior; CAV Systems; CAV Movement Status; Communication Channels and Connection; Route Information; Immediate Surroundings, Vehicles and Events; Wider Surroundings, Traffic and Events; Obstacles and Obstructions; Other Agents; and Secondary Vehicle. The insights were then applied, supported by interface design principles, to inform the layout of a future remote operator workstation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2026-03-03
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Card-Sorting to Determine Information Requirements for Remote Operators of High-Level Automated Vehicles

Hannah Parr, Catherine Harvey, David Large
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Using Card-Sorting to Determine Information Requirements for Remote Operators of High-Level Automated Vehicles

Hannah Parr, Catherine Harvey, David Large
article en

Abstract

High-level connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) may encounter edge cases which require a human to intervene remotely, particularly during the initial implementation and deployment. The nature of these interventions will vary, demanding different operator tasks and competencies—and, in turn, distinct information requirements (IRs). We present an empirically derived, prioritised classification of IRs for remote operators of high-level automated vehicles and translate these into actionable interface design guidance. Seventy potential IRs were initially collated based on established use cases and supporting literature. Following iterative refinement, 39 IRs were evaluated in a card sorting exercise, in which 20 participants (recruited as pairs) were presented with two remote operation use-cases (taken from ten possible use-cases) and asked to group and prioritise the cards—each showing a different information requirement. Two hundred and sixty-five categories were initially generated. These were subsequently refined using cluster analysis (similarity matrices, dendrograms) and verified using inductive thematic analysis, resulting in eleven distinct classifications: Occupant Information; CAV Interior; CAV Systems; CAV Movement Status; Communication Channels and Connection; Route Information; Immediate Surroundings, Vehicles and Events; Wider Surroundings, Traffic and Events; Obstacles and Obstructions; Other Agents; and Secondary Vehicle. The insights were then applied, supported by interface design principles, to inform the layout of a future remote operator workstation.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.