Delayed urticaria during treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine.

Objective To characterize clinical presentation and management of urticaria associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) -targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for migraine prophylaxis.Background CGRP-targeting mAbs are effective in migraine prophylaxis, but have been associated with hypersensitivity reactions, including urticaria. The underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic consequences of these anti-CGRP mAb-related hypersensitivity reactions remain poorly understood.Methods We performed a retrospective case series with descriptive analysis on five patients who developed urticaria after anti-CGRP mAb administration. Timing of reactions, history of urticaria, re-exposure strategies including premedication, and clinical outcomes were analyzed by chart review.Results Urticaria occurred after the first injection in three patients and after the third or sixth injection in two. Onset was delayed (12-48 h) in all patients, indicating a non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. Four of five patients had a prior history of urticaria. All patients were re-exposed: two to the same anti-CGRP mAb and three to a different. Three patients received H1-antihistamine premedication. All premedicated patients in this series tolerated re-exposure, irrespective of switching. One patient experienced worsening urticaria with repeated dosing without premedication despite negative allergy testing, but later tolerated the same anti-CGRP mAb with premedication. In contrast, urticaria or angioedema recurred in two patients who switched anti-CGRP mAb without premedication. One subsequently tolerated rimegepant.Conclusion Anti-CGRP mAb-associated urticaria in this case series was delayed and likely non-immunoglobulin E (non-IgE)-mediated. Our experience supports that in selected patients with delayed urticaria, individualized management, including H1 antihistamine premedication, may allow continuation of effective migraine prophylaxis. Larger cohorts are needed to identify risk factors and to inform general management recommendations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/96162
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delayed urticaria during treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine.

Lukas Heydrich, Athina Papadopoulou, Severin B. Vogt, Federico Burguet Villena et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

Delayed urticaria during treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine.

Lukas Heydrich, Athina Papadopoulou, Severin B. Vogt, Federico Burguet Villena, Karin Hartmann, Christoph T Berger
article en

Abstract

Objective To characterize clinical presentation and management of urticaria associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) -targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for migraine prophylaxis.Background CGRP-targeting mAbs are effective in migraine prophylaxis, but have been associated with hypersensitivity reactions, including urticaria. The underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic consequences of these anti-CGRP mAb-related hypersensitivity reactions remain poorly understood.Methods We performed a retrospective case series with descriptive analysis on five patients who developed urticaria after anti-CGRP mAb administration. Timing of reactions, history of urticaria, re-exposure strategies including premedication, and clinical outcomes were analyzed by chart review.Results Urticaria occurred after the first injection in three patients and after the third or sixth injection in two. Onset was delayed (12-48 h) in all patients, indicating a non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. Four of five patients had a prior history of urticaria. All patients were re-exposed: two to the same anti-CGRP mAb and three to a different. Three patients received H1-antihistamine premedication. All premedicated patients in this series tolerated re-exposure, irrespective of switching. One patient experienced worsening urticaria with repeated dosing without premedication despite negative allergy testing, but later tolerated the same anti-CGRP mAb with premedication. In contrast, urticaria or angioedema recurred in two patients who switched anti-CGRP mAb without premedication. One subsequently tolerated rimegepant.Conclusion Anti-CGRP mAb-associated urticaria in this case series was delayed and likely non-immunoglobulin E (non-IgE)-mediated. Our experience supports that in selected patients with delayed urticaria, individualized management, including H1 antihistamine premedication, may allow continuation of effective migraine prophylaxis. Larger cohorts are needed to identify risk factors and to inform general management recommendations.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.