General anesthesia and depth of anesthesia (DoA) evaluation methods in laboratory animals: a comprehensive review

In preclinical research, general anesthesia is essential for humane and feasible procedures but profoundly modulates autonomic, cardiovascular, neurological, and biochemical systems, risking bias in experimental outcomes. In this review our aim was to synthesize current knowledge on commonly used general anesthetics in laboratory animals, their mechanisms and protocols across species (mice, rats, rabbits, pigs), and evidence-based methods to evaluate depth of anesthesia (DoA). Injectable agents (ketamine with α<sub>2</sub>-agonists, barbiturates, propofol) and inhalational agents (isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane) act primarily via NMDA antagonism or GABA-A/glycine modulation, with distinct profiles for analgesia, hemodynamics, respiration, and recovery. Species-specific dosing and routes are summarized for small rodents, rabbits, and pigs, including practical considerations (e.g., thermoregulation, airway management, malignant hyperthermia risk). DoA assessment spans traditional reflex-based scoring and advanced monitoring. EEG, raw and processed indices (e.g., BIS), offers continuous cortical information but requires species-specific validation and cautious interpretation. Autonomic indicators (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory patterns) and heart-rate variability provide complementary, noninvasive signals yet are confounded by drugs, ventilation, and surgical stimuli. Anesthetic choice is a major experimental variable. Reliable practice demands multimodal DoA monitoring that integrates reflexes, physiologic trends, and, where feasible, EEG, alongside rigorous, species-adapted protocols and transparent reporting. Priorities include validated EEG algorithms for nonhuman species, standardized autonomic indices, and broader adoption of awake models when compatible with scientific aims. These strategies will improve animal welfare and enhance the reproducibility and interpretability of preclinical findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Research Communications
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-026-11126-2
Primary Topic
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

General anesthesia and depth of anesthesia (DoA) evaluation methods in laboratory animals: a comprehensive review

Tülin Altınoluk, Hasan Kazdağlı
Veterinary Research Communications
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
article

General anesthesia and depth of anesthesia (DoA) evaluation methods in laboratory animals: a comprehensive review

Tülin Altınoluk, Hasan Kazdağlı
article en

Abstract

In preclinical research, general anesthesia is essential for humane and feasible procedures but profoundly modulates autonomic, cardiovascular, neurological, and biochemical systems, risking bias in experimental outcomes. In this review our aim was to synthesize current knowledge on commonly used general anesthetics in laboratory animals, their mechanisms and protocols across species (mice, rats, rabbits, pigs), and evidence-based methods to evaluate depth of anesthesia (DoA). Injectable agents (ketamine with α<sub>2</sub>-agonists, barbiturates, propofol) and inhalational agents (isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane) act primarily via NMDA antagonism or GABA-A/glycine modulation, with distinct profiles for analgesia, hemodynamics, respiration, and recovery. Species-specific dosing and routes are summarized for small rodents, rabbits, and pigs, including practical considerations (e.g., thermoregulation, airway management, malignant hyperthermia risk). DoA assessment spans traditional reflex-based scoring and advanced monitoring. EEG, raw and processed indices (e.g., BIS), offers continuous cortical information but requires species-specific validation and cautious interpretation. Autonomic indicators (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory patterns) and heart-rate variability provide complementary, noninvasive signals yet are confounded by drugs, ventilation, and surgical stimuli. Anesthetic choice is a major experimental variable. Reliable practice demands multimodal DoA monitoring that integrates reflexes, physiologic trends, and, where feasible, EEG, alongside rigorous, species-adapted protocols and transparent reporting. Priorities include validated EEG algorithms for nonhuman species, standardized autonomic indices, and broader adoption of awake models when compatible with scientific aims. These strategies will improve animal welfare and enhance the reproducibility and interpretability of preclinical findings.

Veterinary Research CommunicationsVol. 50(3)
Izmir University (TR), İzmir University of Economics (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.