Revisiting the Association of ABO Blood Groups Alongside Vaccination With Patient Outcomes in SARS‐CoV‐2 Respiratory Infection: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Bristol, UK 2020–2023

ABSTRACT Background The 2023 SARS‐CoV‐2 environment differs greatly from the initial outbreak, with new variants and widespread vaccination. Early in the pandemic, blood group A was linked to increased hospitalisation and poor outcomes, but its role now, since the availability of vaccination, is unclear. Methods We analysed data (1 August 2020–31 July 2023) from a prospective cohort of adults hospitalised in Bristol with SARS‐CoV‐2 and known ABO group ( n = 3413). Admission date acted as a proxy for viral strain. Regression models assessed length of stay, survival, cardiovascular complications and ICU admission in non‐O groups versus Group O. Results Group A was over‐represented and Group O was under‐represented, compared to the blood donor population, except during Alpha dominance ( p < 0.001; Alpha: p = 0.796). ABO group generally did not affect cardiovascular risk. However, during Wild‐Type, Group AB had higher odds of cardiovascular complications (odds ratio [OR] = 3.18, p = 0.060) and intensive care unit [ICU] admission (OR = 4.79, p = 0.013). During Omicron, AB group patients had lower 30‐day survival (HR = 2.09, p = 0.018). Group A was less likely to be discharged during Alpha (HR = 0.85, p = 0.013), while Group B was more likely to be discharged during Omicron (HR = 1.30, p = 0.002). Conclusions ABO groups may still influence hospitalisation risk but appear less relevant to outcomes once admitted, likely reflecting advances in care and vaccination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eJHaem
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jha2.70264
Primary Topic
Blood groups and transfusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Association of ABO Blood Groups Alongside Vaccination With Patient Outcomes in SARS‐CoV‐2 Respiratory Infection: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Bristol, UK 2020–2023

Alice Hathaway, Robert Challen, Ashley M. Toye, George Qian et al.
eJHaem
Blood groups and transfusion
article

Revisiting the Association of ABO Blood Groups Alongside Vaccination With Patient Outcomes in SARS‐CoV‐2 Respiratory Infection: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Bristol, UK 2020–2023

Alice Hathaway, Robert Challen, Ashley M. Toye, George Qian, Adam Finn, L Danon, Serena McGuinness, Catherine Hyams, Nick Maskell, Jade King, Jennifer Oliver
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The 2023 SARS‐CoV‐2 environment differs greatly from the initial outbreak, with new variants and widespread vaccination. Early in the pandemic, blood group A was linked to increased hospitalisation and poor outcomes, but its role now, since the availability of vaccination, is unclear. Methods We analysed data (1 August 2020–31 July 2023) from a prospective cohort of adults hospitalised in Bristol with SARS‐CoV‐2 and known ABO group ( n = 3413). Admission date acted as a proxy for viral strain. Regression models assessed length of stay, survival, cardiovascular complications and ICU admission in non‐O groups versus Group O. Results Group A was over‐represented and Group O was under‐represented, compared to the blood donor population, except during Alpha dominance ( p < 0.001; Alpha: p = 0.796). ABO group generally did not affect cardiovascular risk. However, during Wild‐Type, Group AB had higher odds of cardiovascular complications (odds ratio [OR] = 3.18, p = 0.060) and intensive care unit [ICU] admission (OR = 4.79, p = 0.013). During Omicron, AB group patients had lower 30‐day survival (HR = 2.09, p = 0.018). Group A was less likely to be discharged during Alpha (HR = 0.85, p = 0.013), while Group B was more likely to be discharged during Omicron (HR = 1.30, p = 0.002). Conclusions ABO groups may still influence hospitalisation risk but appear less relevant to outcomes once admitted, likely reflecting advances in care and vaccination.

eJHaemVol. 7(2)
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), Southmead Hospital (GB), At Bristol (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Blood groups and transfusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.