Efficacy and safety of approved cellular therapies and bispecific antibodies in solid tumors: the current state

Cancer immunotherapy is a broad term including naked antibodies, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, cancer vaccines, activated immune cells, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Recent advances in immune-engaging T-cell therapies have led to significant progress in novel treatments across various cancer types, resulting in prolonged patient survival, mainly in patients with hematologic malignancies. Several CAR T-cell constructs and BsAbs have been approved by regulatory authorities worldwide for relapsed, refractory leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Solid tumors are characterized by an immunosuppressive, fibroinflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune-suppressive cells, such as regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This, coupled with challenges such as tumor-intrinsic factors (tumor antigen heterogeneity, target antigen loss, hypoxia within the tumor bed, and insufficient preexisting tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs]) and therapy-related hurdles like on-target off-tumor toxicity, impedes the development of durable immune-engaging T-cell therapies across solid tumor types. However, a few BsAbs, TILs, and autologous-engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) therapies have recently been approved across indications, paving the way for newer horizons in the solid tumor cellular therapy landscape. Here, we review the available data on the efficacy and safety of cellular therapies and BsAbs in solid tumors approved thus far by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. These include BsAbs, TILs, and TCR therapy. Given the lack of homogeneous clinical practice guidelines for TCE therapies in solid tumors, we discuss and compare the efficacy and safety of five therapies. We further present the therapeutic pipeline across solid tumors and discuss strategies currently under investigation to optimize T-cell subsets to enhance antitumor efficacy while improving the safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Oncology
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-026-04802-x
Primary Topic
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of approved cellular therapies and bispecific antibodies in solid tumors: the current state

Muhammad Abbas Abid, Virginia Mohlere, Neha Maithel, Samer A. Srour et al.
Discover Oncology
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
article

Efficacy and safety of approved cellular therapies and bispecific antibodies in solid tumors: the current state

Muhammad Abbas Abid, Virginia Mohlere, Neha Maithel, Samer A. Srour, Irfan Vaziri, Muhammad Bilal Abid, Saba Bilal Qamar, Sohaib Irfan, Syed Hassan Jafri, Sanjay Awasthi, Rabab Zehra Jafry
article en

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy is a broad term including naked antibodies, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, cancer vaccines, activated immune cells, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Recent advances in immune-engaging T-cell therapies have led to significant progress in novel treatments across various cancer types, resulting in prolonged patient survival, mainly in patients with hematologic malignancies. Several CAR T-cell constructs and BsAbs have been approved by regulatory authorities worldwide for relapsed, refractory leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. Solid tumors are characterized by an immunosuppressive, fibroinflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune-suppressive cells, such as regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This, coupled with challenges such as tumor-intrinsic factors (tumor antigen heterogeneity, target antigen loss, hypoxia within the tumor bed, and insufficient preexisting tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs]) and therapy-related hurdles like on-target off-tumor toxicity, impedes the development of durable immune-engaging T-cell therapies across solid tumor types. However, a few BsAbs, TILs, and autologous-engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) therapies have recently been approved across indications, paving the way for newer horizons in the solid tumor cellular therapy landscape. Here, we review the available data on the efficacy and safety of cellular therapies and BsAbs in solid tumors approved thus far by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. These include BsAbs, TILs, and TCR therapy. Given the lack of homogeneous clinical practice guidelines for TCE therapies in solid tumors, we discuss and compare the efficacy and safety of five therapies. We further present the therapeutic pipeline across solid tumors and discuss strategies currently under investigation to optimize T-cell subsets to enhance antitumor efficacy while improving the safety profile.

Discover Oncology
Aga Khan University (PK), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), Nebraska Cancer Research Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.