A Theoretical Framework for Visual Weight: Contrast, Size, and Edge Sharpness as Candidate Determinants of Perceived Dominance in Static Images

Version 2 Update: Revised prior to data collection to update hardness magnitude estimates, clarify structural assumptions, and better distinguish the framework’s region-level contribution from spatial-frequency approaches. A full changelog is included in the manuscript. A composition feels resolved when one element clearly leads and unstable when several compete without hierarchy, yet the image properties that produce this experience remain poorly formalized. This preprint presents a theoretical framework for that problem. The framework proposes that perceived compositional dominance depends on three candidate variables: contrast relative to a perceptually defined ground (“canvas”), fractional area, and edge transition sharpness (“hardness”). These variables are combined multiplicatively and embedded within a competitive architecture based on divisive normalization. A provisional chromatic extension accounts for interactions between color and luminance. The manuscript formalizes a concept long discussed qualitatively in art and design practice and derives falsifiable predictions for empirical testing. Related preregistration, stimuli, and materials are available at https://osf.io/dgauz and https://osf.io/kmzgj.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19075716
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Theoretical Framework for Visual Weight: Contrast, Size, and Edge Sharpness as Candidate Determinants of Perceived Dominance in Static Images

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

A Theoretical Framework for Visual Weight: Contrast, Size, and Edge Sharpness as Candidate Determinants of Perceived Dominance in Static Images

article en

Abstract

Version 2 Update: Revised prior to data collection to update hardness magnitude estimates, clarify structural assumptions, and better distinguish the framework’s region-level contribution from spatial-frequency approaches. A full changelog is included in the manuscript. A composition feels resolved when one element clearly leads and unstable when several compete without hierarchy, yet the image properties that produce this experience remain poorly formalized. This preprint presents a theoretical framework for that problem. The framework proposes that perceived compositional dominance depends on three candidate variables: contrast relative to a perceptually defined ground (“canvas”), fractional area, and edge transition sharpness (“hardness”). These variables are combined multiplicatively and embedded within a competitive architecture based on divisive normalization. A provisional chromatic extension accounts for interactions between color and luminance. The manuscript formalizes a concept long discussed qualitatively in art and design practice and derives falsifiable predictions for empirical testing. Related preregistration, stimuli, and materials are available at https://osf.io/dgauz and https://osf.io/kmzgj.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.