Interventional Endoscopy for the Management of Post-Surgical Leaks and Fistulas: A Scoping Review

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Leaks and fistulas are serious surgical complications associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditional management has relied on surgical reintervention or percutaneous drainage, both of which carry significant risks. In recent decades, interventional endoscopy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, offering a growing range of therapeutic options. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the available evidence on endoscopic management of post-surgical leaks and fistulas, with a focus on techniques used, indications, outcomes, and gaps in the literature. <b>Methods:</b> This scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to 5 December 2025. Eligible studies included original studies, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews reporting therapeutic endoscopic interventions for post-surgical leaks or fistulas in any patient population. Case reports and case series with fewer than 20 patients were excluded. Data were charted on study design, surgical context, endoscopic techniques, and reported outcomes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 69 studies were included, comprising 46 original studies involving 2550 patients, along with 11 systematic reviews and 12 narrative reviews. Endoscopic techniques identified included through-the-scope and over-the-scope clipping, stenting, endoscopic vacuum therapy, internal drainage, tissue sealants, endoscopic suturing, and hybrid devices such as VAC-Stent<sup>®</sup>. Reported technical and clinical success rates varied widely across techniques and clinical settings, influenced by defect characteristics, timing of intervention, anatomical location, and operator experience. Endoscopic vacuum therapy was supported by the most consistent evidence, particularly for esophageal and colorectal leaks. <b>Conclusions:</b> Interventional endoscopy represents an increasingly central component in the management of post-surgical leaks and fistulas, enabling individualized, less invasive treatment strategies. However, the current evidence base remains heterogeneous and largely retrospective, underscoring the need for well-designed, multicenter prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062291
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventional Endoscopy for the Management of Post-Surgical Leaks and Fistulas: A Scoping Review

M. Pagliarulo, Tommaso Pessarelli, C. Marfinati Hervoso, Cinzia Boemo et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Interventional Endoscopy for the Management of Post-Surgical Leaks and Fistulas: A Scoping Review

M. Pagliarulo, Tommaso Pessarelli, C. Marfinati Hervoso, Cinzia Boemo, Mauro Zago, Alberta De Monti, Irene Maria Bambina Bergna, Arnaldo Amato, Alessandra Piagnani, Marta La Milia
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Leaks and fistulas are serious surgical complications associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditional management has relied on surgical reintervention or percutaneous drainage, both of which carry significant risks. In recent decades, interventional endoscopy has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative, offering a growing range of therapeutic options. This scoping review aimed to systematically map the available evidence on endoscopic management of post-surgical leaks and fistulas, with a focus on techniques used, indications, outcomes, and gaps in the literature. <b>Methods:</b> This scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to 5 December 2025. Eligible studies included original studies, systematic reviews, and narrative reviews reporting therapeutic endoscopic interventions for post-surgical leaks or fistulas in any patient population. Case reports and case series with fewer than 20 patients were excluded. Data were charted on study design, surgical context, endoscopic techniques, and reported outcomes. <b>Results:</b> A total of 69 studies were included, comprising 46 original studies involving 2550 patients, along with 11 systematic reviews and 12 narrative reviews. Endoscopic techniques identified included through-the-scope and over-the-scope clipping, stenting, endoscopic vacuum therapy, internal drainage, tissue sealants, endoscopic suturing, and hybrid devices such as VAC-Stent<sup>®</sup>. Reported technical and clinical success rates varied widely across techniques and clinical settings, influenced by defect characteristics, timing of intervention, anatomical location, and operator experience. Endoscopic vacuum therapy was supported by the most consistent evidence, particularly for esophageal and colorectal leaks. <b>Conclusions:</b> Interventional endoscopy represents an increasingly central component in the management of post-surgical leaks and fistulas, enabling individualized, less invasive treatment strategies. However, the current evidence base remains heterogeneous and largely retrospective, underscoring the need for well-designed, multicenter prospective studies.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(6)
Alessandro Manzoni Hospital (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.