306P Real-world outcomes and determinants of immune-mediated pneumonitis in stage III NSCLC treated with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy

Results: Among 50 patients with PD-L1 1% (40 Durva, 10 NoDurva), with a PIV cutoff of 332, PFS significantly differed across the four groups (log-rank p=0.00012).Durva_low group had the most favorable PFS, while NoDurva_high group had the poorest outcomes.In multivariable analysis, Durva_low was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression (HR 0.26, 95%CI 0.09-0.78,p=0.016), and NoDurva_high with a higher risk (HR 3.75, 95%CI 1.32-10.69,p=0.013), compared to Durva_high.However, no significant interaction between PIV and treatment group was observed, and PD-L1 was not independently associated with PFS.PIV was not associated with the risk of pneumonitis. Conclusions:PIV is a prognostic biomarker in unresectable stage III NSCLC undergoing CRT, effectively stratifying patients by risk regardless of durvalumab exposure.These findings suggest that PIV may support baseline risk assessment, but do not support a predictive role for PIV in identifying differential benefit from durvalumab.Further validation in a wider cohort is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106616
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

306P Real-world outcomes and determinants of immune-mediated pneumonitis in stage III NSCLC treated with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy

Ariadna Quer-Pi sunyer, M. J. Muñoz, Alfonso Gúrpide, Mónica Ortego et al.
ESMO Open
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

306P Real-world outcomes and determinants of immune-mediated pneumonitis in stage III NSCLC treated with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy

Ariadna Quer-Pi sunyer, M. J. Muñoz, Alfonso Gúrpide, Mónica Ortego, A.J. Castro Alencastre, M. Moreno, A. Vilalta, N. Benito Arango, N. Castro Unanua, M.F. Sanmamed, J.M. Ferrandez, P. Pangua-Irigaray, A.M. Tortajada Lorca
article en

Abstract

Results: Among 50 patients with PD-L1 1% (40 Durva, 10 NoDurva), with a PIV cutoff of 332, PFS significantly differed across the four groups (log-rank p=0.00012).Durva_low group had the most favorable PFS, while NoDurva_high group had the poorest outcomes.In multivariable analysis, Durva_low was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression (HR 0.26, 95%CI 0.09-0.78,p=0.016), and NoDurva_high with a higher risk (HR 3.75, 95%CI 1.32-10.69,p=0.013), compared to Durva_high.However, no significant interaction between PIV and treatment group was observed, and PD-L1 was not independently associated with PFS.PIV was not associated with the risk of pneumonitis. Conclusions:PIV is a prognostic biomarker in unresectable stage III NSCLC undergoing CRT, effectively stratifying patients by risk regardless of durvalumab exposure.These findings suggest that PIV may support baseline risk assessment, but do not support a predictive role for PIV in identifying differential benefit from durvalumab.Further validation in a wider cohort is needed.

ESMO OpenVol. 11
Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.