Counterfactual Explanations for Cautious Random Forests

Traditional machine learning models provide a single-class prediction for a given input instance. This may be inadequate in some scenarios, especially when the cost of erroneous predictions is high. Cautious random forests are cautious classification models that may output sets of possible classes as predictions when uncertainty is high, thus reducing the risk of making incorrect decisions. However, making such indeterminate predictions carries a cost, as resolving indeterminacy typically necessitates further analysis and manual intervention. This work focuses on explaining why an indeterminate prediction has been made and how indeterminacy can be resolved. To this end, we use counterfactual examples associated with determinate predictions. We propose a branch-and-bound algorithm that can efficiently generate proximal, plausible, and actionable counterfactual examples. Several experimental results are presented to demonstrate the advantages of our proposed method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3794856
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counterfactual Explanations for Cautious Random Forests

Marie-Hélène Masson, Benjamin Quost, Haifei Zhang
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Counterfactual Explanations for Cautious Random Forests

Marie-Hélène Masson, Benjamin Quost, Haifei Zhang
article en

Abstract

Traditional machine learning models provide a single-class prediction for a given input instance. This may be inadequate in some scenarios, especially when the cost of erroneous predictions is high. Cautious random forests are cautious classification models that may output sets of possible classes as predictions when uncertainty is high, thus reducing the risk of making incorrect decisions. However, making such indeterminate predictions carries a cost, as resolving indeterminacy typically necessitates further analysis and manual intervention. This work focuses on explaining why an indeterminate prediction has been made and how indeterminacy can be resolved. To this end, we use counterfactual examples associated with determinate predictions. We propose a branch-and-bound algorithm that can efficiently generate proximal, plausible, and actionable counterfactual examples. Several experimental results are presented to demonstrate the advantages of our proposed method.

ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from DataVol. 20(3)
Université de Technologie de Compiègne (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Laboratoire Hubert Curien (FR), Université Jean Monnet (FR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Counterfactual Explanations for Cautious Random Forests — Marie-Hélène Masson, Benjamin Quost, et al. · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS