Comparative Effectiveness of Physical and Virtual Reality Simulators in Robotic Surgical Training

<b>Introduction</b>: Robotic surgery training requires effective simulation methods to ensure proficiency. Virtual reality (VR) simulators and physical models offer different approaches. <b>Methods</b>: A study was conducted with 30 surgical residents, divided into two groups: one trained on a high-fidelity physical simulator and the other on a VR simulator. Both groups completed standardized exercises, followed by an assessment of their surgical performance using the da Vinci Surgical System simulator. Performance scores were analyzed using statistical methods, including <i>t</i>-tests and multiple linear regression. <b>Results</b>: Residents trained on the physical simulator obtained higher scores compared with those using VR simulation, with a statistically significant difference in overall scores (76 ± 17 vs. 34 ± 29; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The use of the physical simulator was the most influential factor in improved performance, independent of the year of residency. <b>Conclusions</b>: High-fidelity physical simulators enhance robotic surgical training compared to VR simulators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15062298
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Physical and Virtual Reality Simulators in Robotic Surgical Training

Gaetano Romano, Federico Davini, Ilaria Ceccarelli, F Calabrò et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Physical and Virtual Reality Simulators in Robotic Surgical Training

Gaetano Romano, Federico Davini, Ilaria Ceccarelli, F Calabrò, Carmelina Cristina Zirafa, Marcello Carlo Ambrogi, Beatrice Manfredini, Fm Melfi, Francesca Romboni, R M Morganti, Arianna Menciassi, Selene Tognarelli
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: Robotic surgery training requires effective simulation methods to ensure proficiency. Virtual reality (VR) simulators and physical models offer different approaches. <b>Methods</b>: A study was conducted with 30 surgical residents, divided into two groups: one trained on a high-fidelity physical simulator and the other on a VR simulator. Both groups completed standardized exercises, followed by an assessment of their surgical performance using the da Vinci Surgical System simulator. Performance scores were analyzed using statistical methods, including <i>t</i>-tests and multiple linear regression. <b>Results</b>: Residents trained on the physical simulator obtained higher scores compared with those using VR simulation, with a statistically significant difference in overall scores (76 ± 17 vs. 34 ± 29; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The use of the physical simulator was the most influential factor in improved performance, independent of the year of residency. <b>Conclusions</b>: High-fidelity physical simulators enhance robotic surgical training compared to VR simulators.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(6)
University of Pisa (IT), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT), Ospedale Annunziata di Cosenza (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.