Can Europe avoid gradually becoming a “Problem Region”?

This editorial examines Europe’s position in a rapidly changing global economic, technological, scientific, and geopolitical environment. The post–World War II world order, which for decades provided relative stability and a predictable framework for international cooperation, is increasingly giving way to a new global structure shaped primarily by economic competitiveness and technological leadership. Over the past fifteen years, major structural changes in the global economy have altered the balance between leading regions, with the United States and China strengthening their competitive positions while Europe’s economic momentum has stagnated. The United States has maintained strong growth through a high tolerance for investment risk, deep capital markets, and sustained support for innovation-driven companies. China’s competitiveness, meanwhile, has been built on centralized strategic decision-making, large-scale industrial capacity, major investments in automation, and a highly educated workforce. At the same time, other large emerging economies and rapidly growing regions, particularly parts of Africa, are gaining demographic and economic advantages that further intensify global competition. In contrast, Europe faces several structural challenges that limit its competitiveness, including relatively low investment in high-risk innovation, high regulatory and taxation burdens, slower decision-making processes, and demographic decline. As a result, Europe’s global share in supporting new high-growth companies has fallen significantly. The editorial argues that prolonged periods of weak economic growth, even when differences appear small annually, can lead to substantial long-term divergence between regions. To avoid gradually becoming a “problem region,” Europe must strengthen its innovation ecosystem, particularly by accelerating the translation of scientific discoveries into start-up companies through universities. Greater collaboration between academia, industry, and financial institutions, combined with increased willingness among investors to support high-risk innovation, will be important for maintaining Europe’s long-term economic, technological, and geopolitical competitiveness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7189/001c.158924
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Europe avoid gradually becoming a “Problem Region”?

on behalf of the JoGHEP’s Editorial Team Igor Rudan and Davies Adeloye
Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
article

Can Europe avoid gradually becoming a “Problem Region”?

on behalf of the JoGHEP’s Editorial Team Igor Rudan and Davies Adeloye
article en

Abstract

This editorial examines Europe’s position in a rapidly changing global economic, technological, scientific, and geopolitical environment. The post–World War II world order, which for decades provided relative stability and a predictable framework for international cooperation, is increasingly giving way to a new global structure shaped primarily by economic competitiveness and technological leadership. Over the past fifteen years, major structural changes in the global economy have altered the balance between leading regions, with the United States and China strengthening their competitive positions while Europe’s economic momentum has stagnated. The United States has maintained strong growth through a high tolerance for investment risk, deep capital markets, and sustained support for innovation-driven companies. China’s competitiveness, meanwhile, has been built on centralized strategic decision-making, large-scale industrial capacity, major investments in automation, and a highly educated workforce. At the same time, other large emerging economies and rapidly growing regions, particularly parts of Africa, are gaining demographic and economic advantages that further intensify global competition. In contrast, Europe faces several structural challenges that limit its competitiveness, including relatively low investment in high-risk innovation, high regulatory and taxation burdens, slower decision-making processes, and demographic decline. As a result, Europe’s global share in supporting new high-growth companies has fallen significantly. The editorial argues that prolonged periods of weak economic growth, even when differences appear small annually, can lead to substantial long-term divergence between regions. To avoid gradually becoming a “problem region,” Europe must strengthen its innovation ecosystem, particularly by accelerating the translation of scientific discoveries into start-up companies through universities. Greater collaboration between academia, industry, and financial institutions, combined with increased willingness among investors to support high-risk innovation, will be important for maintaining Europe’s long-term economic, technological, and geopolitical competitiveness.

Journal of Global Health Economics and PolicyVol. 6
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.