Working-Class Legislators, Bill Writing, and Introduction: Limited Evidence of Substantive Representation in Congress

Few groups are as poorly represented in Congress relative to their prevalence in the population as are members of the working-class. While working-class members of Congress vote more economically liberally than do other members, the extent to which they are more likely to introduce or write legislation to benefit the working-class is unknown. We test whether legislators from a working-class background provide better substantive representation of the working-class by introducing and writing legislation that advances working-class interests compared to non-working-class legislators. Examining Policy Content Scores and sponsorship measures across four congresses covering 3,491 social welfare bills, we find that working-class members are no more likely to write bills that include more policy tools to ensure their preferences are reflected or introduce bills that addressing working-class issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Quarterly
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261434933
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working-Class Legislators, Bill Writing, and Introduction: Limited Evidence of Substantive Representation in Congress

Nicholas Weller, Benjamin G. Bishin, Erinn Lauterbach, Thomas J. Hayes
Political Research Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Working-Class Legislators, Bill Writing, and Introduction: Limited Evidence of Substantive Representation in Congress

Nicholas Weller, Benjamin G. Bishin, Erinn Lauterbach, Thomas J. Hayes
article en

Abstract

Few groups are as poorly represented in Congress relative to their prevalence in the population as are members of the working-class. While working-class members of Congress vote more economically liberally than do other members, the extent to which they are more likely to introduce or write legislation to benefit the working-class is unknown. We test whether legislators from a working-class background provide better substantive representation of the working-class by introducing and writing legislation that advances working-class interests compared to non-working-class legislators. Examining Policy Content Scores and sponsorship measures across four congresses covering 3,491 social welfare bills, we find that working-class members are no more likely to write bills that include more policy tools to ensure their preferences are reflected or introduce bills that addressing working-class issues.

Political Research Quarterly
University of California, Riverside (US), Villanova University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Working-Class Legislators, Bill Writing, and Introduction: Limited Evidence of Substantive Representation in Congress — Nicholas Weller, Benjamin G. Bishin, et al. · Political Research Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS