The PCAOB inspections process over global network firms: synthesizing the perspective of former inspectors with prior research

Calls for greater transparency in PCAOB inspections have intensified amid persistent concerns about opacity and inconsistency. We integrate prior academic research with in-depth interviews from 29 former PCAOB inspectors to construct a detailed, phase-based account of the inspection process over global network firms. We organize insights into four sequential phases—hiring, training, and performance assessment; planning; execution; and resolution—and present structured taxonomies that combine the literature with novel, practice-based observations. The paper’s primary contribution lies in organizing fragmented research and insider perspectives into a framework that clarifies how inspections operate in practice and where further research is critical. This synthesis provides a structured foundation for researchers, practitioners, and regulators seeking to evaluate and strengthen audit oversight—at a time when the structure and independence of the PCAOB itself faces renewed political scrutiny.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-026-09941-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
53.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The PCAOB inspections process over global network firms: synthesizing the perspective of former inspectors with prior research

Kimberly D. Westermann, Eldar Maksymov
1 citations
Review of Accounting Studies
Regulation and Compliance Studies
53.89
article

The PCAOB inspections process over global network firms: synthesizing the perspective of former inspectors with prior research

Kimberly D. Westermann, Eldar Maksymov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Calls for greater transparency in PCAOB inspections have intensified amid persistent concerns about opacity and inconsistency. We integrate prior academic research with in-depth interviews from 29 former PCAOB inspectors to construct a detailed, phase-based account of the inspection process over global network firms. We organize insights into four sequential phases—hiring, training, and performance assessment; planning; execution; and resolution—and present structured taxonomies that combine the literature with novel, practice-based observations. The paper’s primary contribution lies in organizing fragmented research and insider perspectives into a framework that clarifies how inspections operate in practice and where further research is critical. This synthesis provides a structured foundation for researchers, practitioners, and regulators seeking to evaluate and strengthen audit oversight—at a time when the structure and independence of the PCAOB itself faces renewed political scrutiny.

Review of Accounting Studies
California Polytechnic State University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
53.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The PCAOB inspections process over global network firms: synthesizing the perspective of former inspectors with prior research — Kimberly D. Westermann, Eldar Maksymov · Review of Accounting Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS