Archetypes and the Iconic Unconscious: Jung, Benjamin, Adorno and the “strong program” in Cultural Sociology

This article explores the heuristic potential of C. G. Jung’s concepts of archetype and collective unconscious within the sociology of the imaginary, connecting them to the debate between Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno on the Arcades Project. Through a comparison between Jung’s depth psychology, Benjamin’s critique of modernity, and Adorno’s theory of culture, the study shows how the archaic imaginary may serve as an interpretative key to the symbolic and mythical dynamics of capitalist modernity. The article also discusses the contemporary relevance of these concepts in relation to the “strong program” in cultural sociology and the iconic turn, arguing that Jeffrey Alexander’s notion of iconic consciousness can be reinterpreted through Benjamin’s idea of an iconic unconscious. The aim is to outline the foundations of a sociology of the imaginary able to integrate the symbolic, emotional, and material dimensions of social experience.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)
Published
2025-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v16i15s.1079
Primary Topic
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Archetypes and the Iconic Unconscious: Jung, Benjamin, Adorno and the “strong program” in Cultural Sociology

Vincenzo Mele
CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
article

Archetypes and the Iconic Unconscious: Jung, Benjamin, Adorno and the “strong program” in Cultural Sociology

Vincenzo Mele
article en

Abstract

This article explores the heuristic potential of C. G. Jung’s concepts of archetype and collective unconscious within the sociology of the imaginary, connecting them to the debate between Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno on the Arcades Project. Through a comparison between Jung’s depth psychology, Benjamin’s critique of modernity, and Adorno’s theory of culture, the study shows how the archaic imaginary may serve as an interpretative key to the symbolic and mythical dynamics of capitalist modernity. The article also discusses the contemporary relevance of these concepts in relation to the “strong program” in cultural sociology and the iconic turn, arguing that Jeffrey Alexander’s notion of iconic consciousness can be reinterpreted through Benjamin’s idea of an iconic unconscious. The aim is to outline the foundations of a sociology of the imaginary able to integrate the symbolic, emotional, and material dimensions of social experience.

CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.