Respiratory Muscle Dysfunction in Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biological Mechanisms

Revealing biological mechanisms leading to respiratory muscle dysfunction is essential to improve clinical outcomes in patients with critical illness. The purpose was to identify biological mechanisms associated with respiratory muscle dysfunction in patients with critical illness during mechanical ventilation or sepsis. Six databases were electronically searched from inception to January 2025 examining studies with muscle biopsies. Screening, data collection, and risk-of-bias were conducted in duplicate by two independent assessors. Meta-analysis was performed to determine differences in muscle biological parameters of patients with critical illness requiring mechanical ventilation compared to controls. From 22,036 titles screened, eight studies (n=187 patients and n=161 controls) published between 2000-2024 met eligibility criteria. Muscle biopsies were taken between days 1-7 in the intensive care unit from diaphragm (n=110; 3 studies), rectus abdominis (n=68; 5 studies), external intercostal (n=10; 1 study), and latissimus dorsi (n=3; 1 study). Diaphragmatic fiber cross-sectional area was 30% smaller (mean difference [95% confidence interval] =-629 [-876, -382] μm²), with lower proportion of type II fibers (-1.94 [-3.40, -0.49] %) compared with controls. Diaphragmatic fiber force of patients was more than two standard deviations lower (Standardized mean difference=-2.49 [-3.84, -1.14]) and ubiquitinated protein levels were higher (2.09 [-0.14, 4.32]) than controls. Extramyocellular, mitochondrial, and gene expression parameters were assessed in some studies, but low sample size and high heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. In conclusion, muscle biopsies from ventilated patients revealed atrophy, contractile weakness, and proteolysis markers. Standardized methodologies assessing respiratory muscles are needed to clarify biological mechanisms leading to muscle dysfunction and to guide respiratory muscle interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01125.2025
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Respiratory Muscle Dysfunction in Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biological Mechanisms

Cayla Robinson, Felipe Muñoz-Muñoz, Camilo Cáceres-Parra, E Dupont-Versteegden et al.
Journal of Applied Physiology
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Respiratory Muscle Dysfunction in Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biological Mechanisms

Cayla Robinson, Felipe Muñoz-Muñoz, Camilo Cáceres-Parra, E Dupont-Versteegden, Yuan Wen, Felipe González-Seguel, Selina M. Parry, Kirby P Mayer, Owen Gustafson, Catalina Olave, Cecilia Villablanca
article en

Abstract

Revealing biological mechanisms leading to respiratory muscle dysfunction is essential to improve clinical outcomes in patients with critical illness. The purpose was to identify biological mechanisms associated with respiratory muscle dysfunction in patients with critical illness during mechanical ventilation or sepsis. Six databases were electronically searched from inception to January 2025 examining studies with muscle biopsies. Screening, data collection, and risk-of-bias were conducted in duplicate by two independent assessors. Meta-analysis was performed to determine differences in muscle biological parameters of patients with critical illness requiring mechanical ventilation compared to controls. From 22,036 titles screened, eight studies (n=187 patients and n=161 controls) published between 2000-2024 met eligibility criteria. Muscle biopsies were taken between days 1-7 in the intensive care unit from diaphragm (n=110; 3 studies), rectus abdominis (n=68; 5 studies), external intercostal (n=10; 1 study), and latissimus dorsi (n=3; 1 study). Diaphragmatic fiber cross-sectional area was 30% smaller (mean difference [95% confidence interval] =-629 [-876, -382] μm²), with lower proportion of type II fibers (-1.94 [-3.40, -0.49] %) compared with controls. Diaphragmatic fiber force of patients was more than two standard deviations lower (Standardized mean difference=-2.49 [-3.84, -1.14]) and ubiquitinated protein levels were higher (2.09 [-0.14, 4.32]) than controls. Extramyocellular, mitochondrial, and gene expression parameters were assessed in some studies, but low sample size and high heterogeneity prevented meta-analyses. In conclusion, muscle biopsies from ventilated patients revealed atrophy, contractile weakness, and proteolysis markers. Standardized methodologies assessing respiratory muscles are needed to clarify biological mechanisms leading to muscle dysfunction and to guide respiratory muscle interventions.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), University of Kentucky (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Clínica Alemana (CL), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.