Geometric Algorithm of Hadron Production: Local Big Bang Hypothesis — First-Principles Derivation of Jet Formation from k-Foam Axioms

In the Standard Model (QCD), hadron jet formation is calculated using the empirical "Lund string model," which relies on parameter fitting and lacks a fundamental explanation for the timing of string breaking or particle materialization [cite: 733-734]. Furthermore, the direction of spontaneous symmetry breaking is conventionally treated as a random, probabilistic event[cite: 795]. This working paper derives hadron jet formation from first principles using the five dynamical axioms of k-Foam Theory (a discrete geometric framework) and pure geometry (k=3, 4, 5, 6 and the golden ratio φ), completely eliminating empirical parameters[cite: 735]. We reframe hadron production not as "particle fragmentation," but as an "emergency defense protocol of the spatial grid"[cite: 810]: 1. The 4-Phase Local Big Bang: When the k=2 link between quarks reaches the extreme tension of the k=5 transition pass (1.25 fm), complete disconnection (Connected component = 0) is mathematically prohibited by Axiom 3 [cite: 739-742]. To prevent spatial collapse, the system forcibly writes the irresolvable tension into the grid as new k=3 defect pairs (explosive materialization via Axiom 5) [cite: 745-747].2. Golden Ratio (φ) Damper: To avoid wave self-interference that would halt grid updates (Axiom 4), the enormous energy dissipates in a Fibonacci fractal cascade [cite: 748-749, 760-761]. This derives the logarithmic law of hadron multiplicity (N ∝ log_φ(E / 200 MeV)) as a geometric necessity, not an empirical rule [cite: 768-769].3. Deterministic Symmetry Breaking: The topological phase transition from k=6 (vacuum) to k=4 (spatial block) is deterministically specified by the collision vector axis. No randomness is involved [cite: 785, 796-799].4. Consistency with RHIC Data: The recent observations at RHIC (Feb 2026) regarding vacuum materialization and 100% spin correlation are shown to be theoretically consistent with Axiom 5 (topology conservation), requiring no "spooky" non-local communication[cite: 775, 781, 782]. God does not play dice; the universe operates on pure geometric algorithms [cite: 806-807]. https://zenodo.org/records/19026440

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19059783
Primary Topic
Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometric Algorithm of Hadron Production: Local Big Bang Hypothesis — First-Principles Derivation of Jet Formation from k-Foam Axioms

t sato
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
article

Geometric Algorithm of Hadron Production: Local Big Bang Hypothesis — First-Principles Derivation of Jet Formation from k-Foam Axioms

t sato
article en

Abstract

In the Standard Model (QCD), hadron jet formation is calculated using the empirical "Lund string model," which relies on parameter fitting and lacks a fundamental explanation for the timing of string breaking or particle materialization [cite: 733-734]. Furthermore, the direction of spontaneous symmetry breaking is conventionally treated as a random, probabilistic event[cite: 795]. This working paper derives hadron jet formation from first principles using the five dynamical axioms of k-Foam Theory (a discrete geometric framework) and pure geometry (k=3, 4, 5, 6 and the golden ratio φ), completely eliminating empirical parameters[cite: 735]. We reframe hadron production not as "particle fragmentation," but as an "emergency defense protocol of the spatial grid"[cite: 810]: 1. The 4-Phase Local Big Bang: When the k=2 link between quarks reaches the extreme tension of the k=5 transition pass (1.25 fm), complete disconnection (Connected component = 0) is mathematically prohibited by Axiom 3 [cite: 739-742]. To prevent spatial collapse, the system forcibly writes the irresolvable tension into the grid as new k=3 defect pairs (explosive materialization via Axiom 5) [cite: 745-747].2. Golden Ratio (φ) Damper: To avoid wave self-interference that would halt grid updates (Axiom 4), the enormous energy dissipates in a Fibonacci fractal cascade [cite: 748-749, 760-761]. This derives the logarithmic law of hadron multiplicity (N ∝ log_φ(E / 200 MeV)) as a geometric necessity, not an empirical rule [cite: 768-769].3. Deterministic Symmetry Breaking: The topological phase transition from k=6 (vacuum) to k=4 (spatial block) is deterministically specified by the collision vector axis. No randomness is involved [cite: 785, 796-799].4. Consistency with RHIC Data: The recent observations at RHIC (Feb 2026) regarding vacuum materialization and 100% spin correlation are shown to be theoretically consistent with Axiom 5 (topology conservation), requiring no "spooky" non-local communication[cite: 775, 781, 782]. God does not play dice; the universe operates on pure geometric algorithms [cite: 806-807]. https://zenodo.org/records/19026440

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.