Pluralistic AI governance: Indigenous knowledge and the right of Indigenous peoples to self-determination

Abstract This article presents a pluralistic participatory framework for global AI governance that integrates Indigenous knowledge systems and affirms the right to self-determination. The proposed framework is based on the growing recognition of non-extractive, respectful participatory engagement with Indigenous peoples in international governance and policy-making. The paper highlights the importance of Indigenous epistemologies, co-governance, and legal autonomy in developing ethical and culturally inclusive AI systems. The current study presents an institutional model in which Indigenous peoples exercise authority over their knowledge and actively shape the direction of AI through sustained and meaningful participation. Framed through a decolonial lens, the article draws inspiration from the Arctic Council as a model for equitable and effective Indigenous involvement in global AI governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-02938-6
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pluralistic AI governance: Indigenous knowledge and the right of Indigenous peoples to self-determination

Elena Kavanagh
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Pluralistic AI governance: Indigenous knowledge and the right of Indigenous peoples to self-determination

Elena Kavanagh
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a pluralistic participatory framework for global AI governance that integrates Indigenous knowledge systems and affirms the right to self-determination. The proposed framework is based on the growing recognition of non-extractive, respectful participatory engagement with Indigenous peoples in international governance and policy-making. The paper highlights the importance of Indigenous epistemologies, co-governance, and legal autonomy in developing ethical and culturally inclusive AI systems. The current study presents an institutional model in which Indigenous peoples exercise authority over their knowledge and actively shape the direction of AI through sustained and meaningful participation. Framed through a decolonial lens, the article draws inspiration from the Arctic Council as a model for equitable and effective Indigenous involvement in global AI governance.

AI & Society
University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.