Sociotechnical Judgment in Engineering Education: Cases at the Intersection of Energy and Society

Engineering education often emphasizes technical competencies while underemphasizing and devaluing the social, ethical, and political contexts of engineering systems. This gap is particularly pronounced in middle-year courses, where students develop technical fluency but rarely confront the sociotechnical complexity of real-world problems. We propose sociotechnical judgment as a framework to help students see the intimately intertwining nature of technical knowledge and social, ethical, and contextual reasoning, using energy systems—particularly offshore wind—as an illustrative domain. We designed three course-integrated case studies in thermodynamics, circuits, and statics/dynamics to embed sociotechnical judgment in middle-year engineering courses. These cases include pedagogical strategies, such as project-based learning, problem-based learning, and role-play exercises connecting technical analysis with social, environmental, and policy considerations. The design of these case studies is rooted in real-world problems surrounding U.S. offshore wind, engineering science learning outcomes, and ABET student outcomes. In these pedagogies, we have created opportunities for students to analyze technical systems while engaging with social, ecological, and political factors. Offshore wind projects, including turbine siting, transmission system design, and efficiency trade-offs, provide opportunities to operationalize sociotechnical reasoning in authentic, regionally relevant contexts. Sociotechnical judgment provides a practical framework for bridging technical competency and contextual reasoning in engineering education. Integrating sociotechnical cases into core courses will prepare students to navigate complex, real-world systems through engagement with ethical, social, and environmental considerations inherent in engineering practice.