Role of cerebroventricular size and surgical placement in modulating catheter flow distribution

Ventricular shunt catheters are the standard of care for managing hydrocephalus, yet 40% of implanted catheters fail within two years of implantation, mainly due to proximal catheter obstruction. Prior literature suggests that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) preferentially enters the ventricular catheter’s holes farthest from the catheter tip, where obstruction has been thought to frequently occur. However, previous studies have relied on simplified geometries and idealized catheter positioning, limiting the ability to capture patient-specific anatomical variability. Segmental flow distribution in ventricular catheters was analyzed using ventricular models derived from pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. Two pediatric shunted patients and one pediatric externalized patient with varied sizes, ranging from enlarged (FOHR: 0.45), moderate (0.30), and small (0.29), were segmented from MRI scans and reconstructed into closed-volume 3D models. We simulated the insertion of a 4-row, 4-hole ventricular catheter using frontal, parietal, and occipital surgical approaches. A choroid plexus mimic modeled from confocal microscopy was attached to the ventricular system for inlet flow, and a constant flow rate of 0.35 mL/min was applied to simulate CSF flow inside the ventricular domain. Steady-state, laminar 3D computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed to quantify mass flow into each catheter drainage segment. Occipital placement consistently concentrated flow (> 81%) in the fourth (most distal) segment across all ventricular sizes. In contrast, frontal and parietal approaches showed variable flow distributions dependent on ventricular morphology. In the moderate ventricle, parenchymal contact obstructed distal holes, redirecting flow proximally (Segments 1–2: >99%). Segmental flow distribution was influenced by drainage hole patency, ventricular morphology, and catheter orientation. Altogether, these data suggest that anatomical or approach dependent shifts result in specific tissue contact changes and therefore change in flow distribution. A larger sample scale study is needed to understand variability resulting from heterogeneous catheter placement in varying ventricular morphologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-026-00786-6
Primary Topic
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of cerebroventricular size and surgical placement in modulating catheter flow distribution

Leopold Arko, Neena I. Marupudi, Elise Yoon, Sandeep Sood et al.
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
article

Role of cerebroventricular size and surgical placement in modulating catheter flow distribution

Leopold Arko, Neena I. Marupudi, Elise Yoon, Sandeep Sood, Christopher Roberts, Elliot Widd, Bryn A. Martin, Brandon G. Rocque, Carolyn A. Harris
article en

Abstract

Ventricular shunt catheters are the standard of care for managing hydrocephalus, yet 40% of implanted catheters fail within two years of implantation, mainly due to proximal catheter obstruction. Prior literature suggests that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) preferentially enters the ventricular catheter’s holes farthest from the catheter tip, where obstruction has been thought to frequently occur. However, previous studies have relied on simplified geometries and idealized catheter positioning, limiting the ability to capture patient-specific anatomical variability. Segmental flow distribution in ventricular catheters was analyzed using ventricular models derived from pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. Two pediatric shunted patients and one pediatric externalized patient with varied sizes, ranging from enlarged (FOHR: 0.45), moderate (0.30), and small (0.29), were segmented from MRI scans and reconstructed into closed-volume 3D models. We simulated the insertion of a 4-row, 4-hole ventricular catheter using frontal, parietal, and occipital surgical approaches. A choroid plexus mimic modeled from confocal microscopy was attached to the ventricular system for inlet flow, and a constant flow rate of 0.35 mL/min was applied to simulate CSF flow inside the ventricular domain. Steady-state, laminar 3D computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed to quantify mass flow into each catheter drainage segment. Occipital placement consistently concentrated flow (> 81%) in the fourth (most distal) segment across all ventricular sizes. In contrast, frontal and parietal approaches showed variable flow distributions dependent on ventricular morphology. In the moderate ventricle, parenchymal contact obstructed distal holes, redirecting flow proximally (Segments 1–2: >99%). Segmental flow distribution was influenced by drainage hole patency, ventricular morphology, and catheter orientation. Altogether, these data suggest that anatomical or approach dependent shifts result in specific tissue contact changes and therefore change in flow distribution. A larger sample scale study is needed to understand variability resulting from heterogeneous catheter placement in varying ventricular morphologies.

Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
University of Idaho (US), Wayne State University (US), Providence Hospital (US), Children's of Alabama (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Children's Hospital of Michigan (US), Lux Research (United States) (US), C. S. Mott Children's Hospital (US), Providence Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.