Will I Regret This? Should I Care? On Regret and Wellbeing

ABSTRACT Regret colours many areas of our lives, from the vital to the trivial. One example is in medical decision‐making, when physicians hesitate to provide procedures they think their patients will regret. For instance, physicians sometimes refuse younger women's requests for elective sterilization. Hesitating when we believe that we or someone else will regret a decision seems commonsensical: presumably this protects us from making poor choices. But we lack a clear understanding of how regret impacts wellbeing. Before invoking the risk of regret to steer decision‐making, we must scrutinize the widespread aversion to making regrettable choices and the intuition that we fare poorly when we regret. Contrary to the commonsense view that regret should be avoided, this article shows that regret is not prudentially weighty, and we go wrong when we prioritize regret in decision‐making. This article isolates three ways in which something might be prudentially weighty: (1) it harms us; (2) it indicates that a harm has occurred; or (3) it inhibits a benefit. Despite our intuitions, regret is not itself harmful; it does not reliably indicate harm; and it does not preclude benefit. Knowing this enables us to evaluate critically how we currently treat regret in practical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Philosophy
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/japp.70078
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will I Regret This? Should I Care? On Regret and Wellbeing

Alyssa Izatt
Journal of Applied Philosophy
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Will I Regret This? Should I Care? On Regret and Wellbeing

Alyssa Izatt
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Regret colours many areas of our lives, from the vital to the trivial. One example is in medical decision‐making, when physicians hesitate to provide procedures they think their patients will regret. For instance, physicians sometimes refuse younger women's requests for elective sterilization. Hesitating when we believe that we or someone else will regret a decision seems commonsensical: presumably this protects us from making poor choices. But we lack a clear understanding of how regret impacts wellbeing. Before invoking the risk of regret to steer decision‐making, we must scrutinize the widespread aversion to making regrettable choices and the intuition that we fare poorly when we regret. Contrary to the commonsense view that regret should be avoided, this article shows that regret is not prudentially weighty, and we go wrong when we prioritize regret in decision‐making. This article isolates three ways in which something might be prudentially weighty: (1) it harms us; (2) it indicates that a harm has occurred; or (3) it inhibits a benefit. Despite our intuitions, regret is not itself harmful; it does not reliably indicate harm; and it does not preclude benefit. Knowing this enables us to evaluate critically how we currently treat regret in practical contexts.

Journal of Applied Philosophy
University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.