Traumatic splenic injury in the elderly population: Does management choice affect outcome?

Purpose Trauma within older people is increasingly recognised as a different entity, with different management and outcomes to younger people. We aim to compare the 30-day survival and length of stay of splenic injury patients in English major trauma centres in an elderly trauma (65+) cohort in comparison to under 65. Methods Data were obtained from the Trauma Audit Research Network of all Grade 2–5 American Association of Surgery in Trauma (AAST) splenic injuries admitted to English Major Trauma Centres between 01/01/17 and 31/12/21. End-points of mortality and length of stay were compared between the under 65 and 65+ groups according to treatment using descriptive statistics and multi-variable regression analysis. Results In total, 802/3958 (20.2%) of admissions were 65+ and 2926/3958 (73.9%) were male. The proportion of AAST grades 3–5 was 41.3% (331/802) for 65+ and 52.3% (1652/3156) for under 65. A total of 12.8% (103/802) received embolisation in the 65+ group and 13.1% (413/3156) within the under 65 group. In total, 6.9% (55/802) in the 65+ group received splenectomy compared to 10.1% (319/3156). Within the 65+ group, 30-day mortality in the splenectomy group was 14.5% (8/55) compared to embolisation (18/103, 17.5%) and conservative (141/644, 21.9%). The 30-day mortality was (10.3%, 33/319) in those having a splenectomy as first treatment in the under 65's, compared with embolisation (26/413, 6.3%) and conservative management (197/2424, 8.1%). Embolisation failure was 3.9% (4/103) in the 65+ group and 7.3% (30/413) in the under 65 group. Splenectomy is associated with an increased length of stay at 1.20 (confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 1.37) times longer; however, this was not affected by age group. Conclusion Mortality was higher in the under 65 cohort regardless of treatment. Splenectomy is associated with an increased length of stay compared to embolisation, however there is no clear interaction demonstrated between age and first treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14604086261430458
Primary Topic
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traumatic splenic injury in the elderly population: Does management choice affect outcome?

P. Jenkins, Smith Jason, Sorrell Lexy, Tan Yinji et al.
Trauma
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
article

Traumatic splenic injury in the elderly population: Does management choice affect outcome?

P. Jenkins, Smith Jason, Sorrell Lexy, Tan Yinji, Barnett Anton, Allgar Victoria, Graham Blair, Roobottom Carl
article en

Abstract

Purpose Trauma within older people is increasingly recognised as a different entity, with different management and outcomes to younger people. We aim to compare the 30-day survival and length of stay of splenic injury patients in English major trauma centres in an elderly trauma (65+) cohort in comparison to under 65. Methods Data were obtained from the Trauma Audit Research Network of all Grade 2–5 American Association of Surgery in Trauma (AAST) splenic injuries admitted to English Major Trauma Centres between 01/01/17 and 31/12/21. End-points of mortality and length of stay were compared between the under 65 and 65+ groups according to treatment using descriptive statistics and multi-variable regression analysis. Results In total, 802/3958 (20.2%) of admissions were 65+ and 2926/3958 (73.9%) were male. The proportion of AAST grades 3–5 was 41.3% (331/802) for 65+ and 52.3% (1652/3156) for under 65. A total of 12.8% (103/802) received embolisation in the 65+ group and 13.1% (413/3156) within the under 65 group. In total, 6.9% (55/802) in the 65+ group received splenectomy compared to 10.1% (319/3156). Within the 65+ group, 30-day mortality in the splenectomy group was 14.5% (8/55) compared to embolisation (18/103, 17.5%) and conservative (141/644, 21.9%). The 30-day mortality was (10.3%, 33/319) in those having a splenectomy as first treatment in the under 65's, compared with embolisation (26/413, 6.3%) and conservative management (197/2424, 8.1%). Embolisation failure was 3.9% (4/103) in the 65+ group and 7.3% (30/413) in the under 65 group. Splenectomy is associated with an increased length of stay at 1.20 (confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 1.37) times longer; however, this was not affected by age group. Conclusion Mortality was higher in the under 65 cohort regardless of treatment. Splenectomy is associated with an increased length of stay compared to embolisation, however there is no clear interaction demonstrated between age and first treatment.

Trauma
University of Oxford (GB), University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (GB), University of Plymouth (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.