Accounting for Substitution: Improving Estimates of <scp>GHG</scp> Reductions From Cattle‐Based Product Demand Shifts

ABSTRACT Estimates of reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from lower demand for cattle‐based products must account for substitution effects. This study collected data through two surveys—one on ground beef and another on dairy milk—to evaluate substitution effects and potential GHG reductions. Results indicate that informing consumers about product‐level emissions decreases demand for cattle products and GHG emissions. However, ignoring substitution effects leads to an overestimation of the actual emission reduction potential. For accurate assessments, substitution effects should be included when estimating emission reductions for cattle‐based products to better reflect the true GHG mitigation potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70059
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting for Substitution: Improving Estimates of GHG Reductions From Cattle‐Based Product Demand Shifts

Lawton Lanier Nalley, Alvaro Durand‐Morat, Aaron M. Shew, Brandon R. McFadden et al.
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Accounting for Substitution: Improving Estimates of GHG Reductions From Cattle‐Based Product Demand Shifts

Lawton Lanier Nalley, Alvaro Durand‐Morat, Aaron M. Shew, Brandon R. McFadden, Rodolfo M. Nayga, Sara Gardner Hedgecock
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Estimates of reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from lower demand for cattle‐based products must account for substitution effects. This study collected data through two surveys—one on ground beef and another on dairy milk—to evaluate substitution effects and potential GHG reductions. Results indicate that informing consumers about product‐level emissions decreases demand for cattle products and GHG emissions. However, ignoring substitution effects leads to an overestimation of the actual emission reduction potential. For accurate assessments, substitution effects should be included when estimating emission reductions for cattle‐based products to better reflect the true GHG mitigation potential.

Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Korea University (KR), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.