Case tools for humanity

Abstract The case examines Tools for Humanity (TFH), a company that developed a project aiming to create a global digital identity system based on biometrics, using iris-scanning devices to generate a unique cryptographic code linked to the distribution of a cryptocurrency (Worldcoin). Initially conceived to support a Universal Basic Income (UBI) policy, the initiative evolved into a mechanism for proof of humanity in response to the rise of bots on the internet. However, the project raised significant legal and ethical concerns, especially regarding transparency, informed consent, and the protection of sensitive data. Several countries launched investigations into the company’s practices, which included data collection in vulnerable communities – and, in some cases, from minors. Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in multiple jurisdictions suspended the company’s biometric collection activities conducted in exchange for cryptocurrency, deeming the practice exploitative of vulnerable populations and incompatible with the right to revoke consent, since the “World ID” could not be deleted once generated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of integrated global STEM
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jigs-2026-0005
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case tools for humanity

Marina Feferbaum, Alexandre Pacheco da Silva
Journal of integrated global STEM
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Case tools for humanity

Marina Feferbaum, Alexandre Pacheco da Silva
article en

Abstract

Abstract The case examines Tools for Humanity (TFH), a company that developed a project aiming to create a global digital identity system based on biometrics, using iris-scanning devices to generate a unique cryptographic code linked to the distribution of a cryptocurrency (Worldcoin). Initially conceived to support a Universal Basic Income (UBI) policy, the initiative evolved into a mechanism for proof of humanity in response to the rise of bots on the internet. However, the project raised significant legal and ethical concerns, especially regarding transparency, informed consent, and the protection of sensitive data. Several countries launched investigations into the company’s practices, which included data collection in vulnerable communities – and, in some cases, from minors. Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in multiple jurisdictions suspended the company’s biometric collection activities conducted in exchange for cryptocurrency, deeming the practice exploitative of vulnerable populations and incompatible with the right to revoke consent, since the “World ID” could not be deleted once generated.

Journal of integrated global STEM
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.