Feasibility and acceptability of “LiCPain” pilot randomised controlled trial of continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine or placebo for people with neuropathic cancer pain: a qualitative study of patient and carer perceptions and experiences

Optimal intervention and clinical trial designs require consumer contributions. The experience of people with advanced cancer and palliative care needs in neuropathic pain trials is seldom reported. This exploratory descriptive qualitative sub-study aimed to understand the experience of patients and carers participating in the Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain (LiCPain) study, a pilot randomised controlled trial of continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine hydrochloride or placebo over 72 h in people with unrelieved neuropathic cancer pain. All participants enrolled in the trial, conducted at five Australian palliative care inpatient sites, were intended to be invited to participate at the time of consenting to the main study. Reasons for not being invited, consenting to or completing the interview sub-study were not collected. A single face-to-face or telephone interview was audio recorded by the site study team nurses or doctors using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were analysed following Braun and Clarke thematic analysis approach. Out of 17 participants randomised to the LiCPain trial, seven participants and one carer consented to participate in the qualitative sub-study. Three major themes were identified: • Trial participation offered a sense of hope and purpose; • The impact of the intervention has multiple contributing factors; and • Pain impacts every aspect of life. Participants found hope and purpose in the Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain trial. Contextual factors influenced perceived effectiveness. These findings will inform future intervention designs and clinical trials to improve outcomes for people experiencing unrelieved neuropathic cancer pain. This trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000747325) on 22nd May 2017.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02043-x
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and acceptability of “LiCPain” pilot randomised controlled trial of continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine or placebo for people with neuropathic cancer pain: a qualitative study of patient and carer perceptions and experiences

Meera Agar, David C. Currow, Jane Phillips, Marian Kow et al.
BMC Palliative Care
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Feasibility and acceptability of “LiCPain” pilot randomised controlled trial of continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine or placebo for people with neuropathic cancer pain: a qualitative study of patient and carer perceptions and experiences

Meera Agar, David C. Currow, Jane Phillips, Marian Kow, Emily Huang, Kat Urban, Jessica Lee, Dipti Mittal, Anthony Linton, Belinda Butcher, Priyanka Vandersman, Belinda Fazekas, Caitlin Sheehan, Megan Ritchie, Christine Sanderson, Davinia S. E. Seah, Ghauri Aggarwal, Angela Rao, A. McLachlan, Rajesh Aggarwal, Chadi Ayoub, Melanie Lovell, Rachel George, Bev Noble, Richard Chye
article en

Abstract

Optimal intervention and clinical trial designs require consumer contributions. The experience of people with advanced cancer and palliative care needs in neuropathic pain trials is seldom reported. This exploratory descriptive qualitative sub-study aimed to understand the experience of patients and carers participating in the Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain (LiCPain) study, a pilot randomised controlled trial of continuous subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine hydrochloride or placebo over 72 h in people with unrelieved neuropathic cancer pain. All participants enrolled in the trial, conducted at five Australian palliative care inpatient sites, were intended to be invited to participate at the time of consenting to the main study. Reasons for not being invited, consenting to or completing the interview sub-study were not collected. A single face-to-face or telephone interview was audio recorded by the site study team nurses or doctors using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were analysed following Braun and Clarke thematic analysis approach. Out of 17 participants randomised to the LiCPain trial, seven participants and one carer consented to participate in the qualitative sub-study. Three major themes were identified: • Trial participation offered a sense of hope and purpose; • The impact of the intervention has multiple contributing factors; and • Pain impacts every aspect of life. Participants found hope and purpose in the Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain trial. Contextual factors influenced perceived effectiveness. These findings will inform future intervention designs and clinical trials to improve outcomes for people experiencing unrelieved neuropathic cancer pain. This trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000747325) on 22nd May 2017.

BMC Palliative Care
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Greenwich Hospital (US), New South Wales Department of Health (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Flinders University (AU), Central Land Council (AU), Concord Repatriation General Hospital (AU), IP Australia (AU), Flinders Medical Centre (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Calvary Hospital (AU), Alice Springs Hospital (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.