Robot-assisted, Laparoscopic and Transvaginal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Comparative Retrospective Single-Center Study
RAS and LPS had similar safety and reintervention profiles. LPS was linked to longer operating times than RAS, and similar hospital stay. TVS had shorter operating times but required longer hospitalization. Sub-analyses suggested comparable performance for lateral suspension, while LPS sacrocolpopexy was more time-consuming than RAS.
Authors
- Tiziana Fidecicchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9191-6385)
- Paolo Mannella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8146-6731)
- Elena Pisacreta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1604-9177)
- Giulia Misasi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4056-9328)
- Marta Caretto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1157-9930)
- A. Giannini
- Amerigo Ferrari
- Maria Magdalena Montt-Guevara
- Tommaso Simoncini
- Eleonora Russo
Institutions
- University of Pisa (IT)
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Urogynecology Journal
- Published
- 2026-03-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06571-1
- Primary Topic
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00