Methods for assessing efficacy of cleaning and disinfection in livestock farms: a narrative review

Research done as part of the Horizon Europe project 'Enhanced and cost-effective biosecurity in livestock production', BIOSECURE Abstract Cleaning and disinfection (C&D) procedures are essential components of farm biosecurity, aiming to reduce microbial load and eliminate the pathogenic microorganisms in livestock farms facilities. This review examines the various methods used to assess the effectiveness of both cleaning and disinfection, exploring their strengths, limitations, and optimal-use scenarios. For cleaningevaluation, common methods include basic visual inspections, ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence, rapid protein tests (RPT), redox potential, and microbiological swabbing. However, visual inspections and UV fluorescence alone provide only qualitative insights. ATP offers quantitative data, though the accuracy can be influenced by the presence of detergents or disinfectants, requiring careful calibration. Additionally, ATP and RPT testing demands standardization to ensure consistent results. A new promising redox method is fast and more accurate, however still has limited field applicability. Microbiological methods, while highly accurate in detecting microbial contamination, are resourceintensive and therefore not in frequent use for routine evaluation of the cleaning procedures. For assessment of disinfection procedures microbiological tests such as colony-forming unit counts on agar plates, as well as the use of selective media for target microbes or hygiene indicator organisms are more appropriate than non-microbiological tests as they offer direct evidence of microbial elimination. However, these methods can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. Molecular methods can be powerful tools in detecting hard-to-culture organisms, however, are more expensive and require specialized equipment. Given these challenges,our study recommends a comprehensive C&D evaluation protocol, incorporating multiple methods tailored to the farm’s specific biosecurity needs and epidemiological context. This integrated approach improves the reliability and efficiency of C&Dmonitoring, ensuring robust hygiene management in farm settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19061050
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for assessing efficacy of cleaning and disinfection in livestock farms: a narrative review

Julia Gabrielle Jerab, Pankaj Dhaka, Ilias Chantziaras, Evelien Biebaut et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Microbial infections and disease research
article

Methods for assessing efficacy of cleaning and disinfection in livestock farms: a narrative review

Julia Gabrielle Jerab, Pankaj Dhaka, Ilias Chantziaras, Evelien Biebaut, Leonid Korniienko, Laura Courtens, Jeroen Dewulf, Iryna Makovska
article en

Abstract

Research done as part of the Horizon Europe project 'Enhanced and cost-effective biosecurity in livestock production', BIOSECURE Abstract Cleaning and disinfection (C&D) procedures are essential components of farm biosecurity, aiming to reduce microbial load and eliminate the pathogenic microorganisms in livestock farms facilities. This review examines the various methods used to assess the effectiveness of both cleaning and disinfection, exploring their strengths, limitations, and optimal-use scenarios. For cleaningevaluation, common methods include basic visual inspections, ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence, rapid protein tests (RPT), redox potential, and microbiological swabbing. However, visual inspections and UV fluorescence alone provide only qualitative insights. ATP offers quantitative data, though the accuracy can be influenced by the presence of detergents or disinfectants, requiring careful calibration. Additionally, ATP and RPT testing demands standardization to ensure consistent results. A new promising redox method is fast and more accurate, however still has limited field applicability. Microbiological methods, while highly accurate in detecting microbial contamination, are resourceintensive and therefore not in frequent use for routine evaluation of the cleaning procedures. For assessment of disinfection procedures microbiological tests such as colony-forming unit counts on agar plates, as well as the use of selective media for target microbes or hygiene indicator organisms are more appropriate than non-microbiological tests as they offer direct evidence of microbial elimination. However, these methods can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. Molecular methods can be powerful tools in detecting hard-to-culture organisms, however, are more expensive and require specialized equipment. Given these challenges,our study recommends a comprehensive C&D evaluation protocol, incorporating multiple methods tailored to the farm’s specific biosecurity needs and epidemiological context. This integrated approach improves the reliability and efficiency of C&Dmonitoring, ensuring robust hygiene management in farm settings.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Microbial infections and disease research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.