Investigating the effect of 30 km/h on neighborhood traffic safety perceptions- A three-wave repeated cross-sectional study in the Netherlands

Urban 30 km/h speed limits are increasingly implemented, potentially affecting perceived traffic safety. We assess how exposure to streets transitioning from 50 km/h to 30 km/h affects residents' traffic safety perceptions. We analyzed repeated cross-sectional data from two administrative surveys (N = 4968 and 5146) spanning 2015, 2017, and 2019. Exposure was defined as living within 400m of fifty-six streets across Rotterdam where speed limits reduced from 50 km/h to 30 km/h. Controls lived within 400m of streets undergoing future reductions. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we compared the probability of reporting seven binary outcomes on traffic-related safety, environmental annoyance, and pedestrian and cyclist safety between exposed and control individuals before and after speed limit reductions. We stratified the intervention group in tertiles of intervention street proportion within 400m Euclidian buffers, and additionally cross-sectionally investigated the association between dosage of intervention street density and perceived safety outcomes. No significant differences were observed between residents living near intervention streets and those near control streets. Small, non-significant improvements were found for perceived speeding (−4.6 percentage points (%pt) [95%CI -10.5,1.3]) and aggressive driving (−5.8%pt [95%CI -11.8,0.2]), while bicycle path safety showed a non-significant effect in the opposite direction (6.3%pt [95%CI -0.07,12.6]). The stratified analysis showed a non-significant improvement in the highest exposure tertile of sidewalk safety, but was inconclusive for the other indicators. Dosage findings indicated that a 5% increase in nearby intervention streets was associated with a lower probability of perceived speeding (−1.9%pt [95%CI −3.1,−0.6]), aggressive driving behavior (−1.5%pt [95%CI -3.1,0.04]) and increased bicycle path safety (−1.6%pt [95%CI -3.3,0.04]). Reducing urban speed limits to 30 km/h may have contributed to small, non-significant improvements in perceived traffic safety. The study may have been underpowered to detect statistically significant effects. Future studies should examine intended and unintended effects of traffic safety interventions. • Residents near 30 km/h streets may perceive less speeding and aggressive driving. • Intervention exposure defined as distance to and density of new 30 km/h streets. • Mixed evidence on active transport safety perceptions. • Findings suggest distal consequences of lower speed limits were not affected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport & Health
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2026.102288
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the effect of 30 km/h on neighborhood traffic safety perceptions- A three-wave repeated cross-sectional study in the Netherlands

Alfred Wagtendonk, R.J. Veldhuizen, Anna Bornioli, N den Braver et al.
Journal of Transport & Health
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Investigating the effect of 30 km/h on neighborhood traffic safety perceptions- A three-wave repeated cross-sectional study in the Netherlands

Alfred Wagtendonk, R.J. Veldhuizen, Anna Bornioli, N den Braver, Reint Andreas Huijzendveld, Pilar García-Gómez, Mariëlle A. Beenackers, Carel-Peter L. van Erpecum, Frank J. van Lenthe, Famke JM. Mölenberg
article en

Abstract

Urban 30 km/h speed limits are increasingly implemented, potentially affecting perceived traffic safety. We assess how exposure to streets transitioning from 50 km/h to 30 km/h affects residents' traffic safety perceptions. We analyzed repeated cross-sectional data from two administrative surveys (N = 4968 and 5146) spanning 2015, 2017, and 2019. Exposure was defined as living within 400m of fifty-six streets across Rotterdam where speed limits reduced from 50 km/h to 30 km/h. Controls lived within 400m of streets undergoing future reductions. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we compared the probability of reporting seven binary outcomes on traffic-related safety, environmental annoyance, and pedestrian and cyclist safety between exposed and control individuals before and after speed limit reductions. We stratified the intervention group in tertiles of intervention street proportion within 400m Euclidian buffers, and additionally cross-sectionally investigated the association between dosage of intervention street density and perceived safety outcomes. No significant differences were observed between residents living near intervention streets and those near control streets. Small, non-significant improvements were found for perceived speeding (−4.6 percentage points (%pt) [95%CI -10.5,1.3]) and aggressive driving (−5.8%pt [95%CI -11.8,0.2]), while bicycle path safety showed a non-significant effect in the opposite direction (6.3%pt [95%CI -0.07,12.6]). The stratified analysis showed a non-significant improvement in the highest exposure tertile of sidewalk safety, but was inconclusive for the other indicators. Dosage findings indicated that a 5% increase in nearby intervention streets was associated with a lower probability of perceived speeding (−1.9%pt [95%CI −3.1,−0.6]), aggressive driving behavior (−1.5%pt [95%CI -3.1,0.04]) and increased bicycle path safety (−1.6%pt [95%CI -3.3,0.04]). Reducing urban speed limits to 30 km/h may have contributed to small, non-significant improvements in perceived traffic safety. The study may have been underpowered to detect statistically significant effects. Future studies should examine intended and unintended effects of traffic safety interventions. • Residents near 30 km/h streets may perceive less speeding and aggressive driving. • Intervention exposure defined as distance to and density of new 30 km/h streets. • Mixed evidence on active transport safety perceptions. • Findings suggest distal consequences of lower speed limits were not affected.

Journal of Transport & HealthVol. 49
Tinbergen Institute (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), University of Surrey (GB), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.