Time Required to Retreat Carrier-Based Obturation: Comparison Between Two Techniques at Two Levels of Experience

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aims to compare two techniques for the removal of Thermafil obturators, evaluating the influence of operator experience in two different typologies of samples. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty single-rooted extracted teeth with round canals and sixty 3D-printed teeth reproducing a maxillary central incisor were obturated with Thermafil obturators. Retreatment was undertaken under a dental operating microscope by an experienced endodontist and a novice operator using either the braiding technique or Reciproc. The removal time was recorded. <b>Results:</b> Considering natural teeth, seven failures were registered, and 60 carriers were removed successfully (90%). Removal time was significantly shorter for the experienced operator than for the novice (Braiding technique: <i>p</i> < 0.001; Reciproc: <i>p</i> = 0.001). No statistically significant difference emerged in the expert operator between braiding and reciprocating techniques (<i>p</i> = 0.403), while a longer carrier removal time emerged in the novice operator using the manual instrumentation (<i>p</i> = 0.019). Considering 3D-printed teeth, eight failures were registered, and 60 carriers were removed successfully (88%). There was no significant difference in removal time between novice and experienced operators. Carrier removal time was significantly lower in the braiding technique for the novice compared to the experienced operator (<i>p</i> = 0.017). This difference was not observed for the reciprocating instrumentation (<i>p</i> = 0.244). Regarding experience, in both operators, removal time was shorter with reciprocating instrumentation than with the braiding technique (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The braiding technique and Reciproc are effective in the retreatment of straight, round-section canals filled with Thermafil. Within the limits of this in vitro study, restoration of the working length can be undertaken quickly and with favourable outcomes. Experience significantly affects the removal time of carrier-based obturations. The removal technique did not influence retrieval time in the experienced operator, while the Reciproc proved to be an effective aid for the novice operator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14030173
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time Required to Retreat Carrier-Based Obturation: Comparison Between Two Techniques at Two Levels of Experience

Matteo Salvadori, Elisabetta Audino, Mario Alovisi, Luca Visconti et al.
Dentistry Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Time Required to Retreat Carrier-Based Obturation: Comparison Between Two Techniques at Two Levels of Experience

Matteo Salvadori, Elisabetta Audino, Mario Alovisi, Luca Visconti, Stefano Salgarello, Miriam Facchinetti, Vikas Kumar
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aims to compare two techniques for the removal of Thermafil obturators, evaluating the influence of operator experience in two different typologies of samples. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty single-rooted extracted teeth with round canals and sixty 3D-printed teeth reproducing a maxillary central incisor were obturated with Thermafil obturators. Retreatment was undertaken under a dental operating microscope by an experienced endodontist and a novice operator using either the braiding technique or Reciproc. The removal time was recorded. <b>Results:</b> Considering natural teeth, seven failures were registered, and 60 carriers were removed successfully (90%). Removal time was significantly shorter for the experienced operator than for the novice (Braiding technique: <i>p</i> < 0.001; Reciproc: <i>p</i> = 0.001). No statistically significant difference emerged in the expert operator between braiding and reciprocating techniques (<i>p</i> = 0.403), while a longer carrier removal time emerged in the novice operator using the manual instrumentation (<i>p</i> = 0.019). Considering 3D-printed teeth, eight failures were registered, and 60 carriers were removed successfully (88%). There was no significant difference in removal time between novice and experienced operators. Carrier removal time was significantly lower in the braiding technique for the novice compared to the experienced operator (<i>p</i> = 0.017). This difference was not observed for the reciprocating instrumentation (<i>p</i> = 0.244). Regarding experience, in both operators, removal time was shorter with reciprocating instrumentation than with the braiding technique (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The braiding technique and Reciproc are effective in the retreatment of straight, round-section canals filled with Thermafil. Within the limits of this in vitro study, restoration of the working length can be undertaken quickly and with favourable outcomes. Experience significantly affects the removal time of carrier-based obturations. The removal technique did not influence retrieval time in the experienced operator, while the Reciproc proved to be an effective aid for the novice operator.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(3)
University of Turin (IT), University of Brescia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.