How is Child Maltreatment Defined and Assessed in China: A Scoping Review

Studies show considerable cultural variation in the definitions and measurements of child maltreatment (CM). This limits the comparability of findings, the formulation of policy, and tailored interventions. This review systematically maps existing published research regarding CM definitions and measurements, as well as related laws in China. A scoping review was conducted to explore the relevant published literature in English and Chinese from eight databases and legal documents between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2025. Our review identified 34 full-text studies on perceptions of CM in China, six laws related to CM and child protection, and seven scales that are frequently used to assess CM. Five characteristics emerged that explain CM operational definitions in China: frequency, outcome, intention, blood relationship, and perpetrator. Most scales focus solely on abusive behaviors, neglecting multiple characteristics, which may lead to culturally biased interpretations. Discrepancies exist between the CM operationalization framework and its measurement in China. The interpretation of CM results should be approached with caution, considering the operational definitions applicable to different cultural contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma Violence & Abuse
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380261419508
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How is Child Maltreatment Defined and Assessed in China: A Scoping Review

Juzhe XI, Brian J. Hall, Liying Yang, Yuming Liu
Trauma Violence & Abuse
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

How is Child Maltreatment Defined and Assessed in China: A Scoping Review

Juzhe XI, Brian J. Hall, Liying Yang, Yuming Liu
article en

Abstract

Studies show considerable cultural variation in the definitions and measurements of child maltreatment (CM). This limits the comparability of findings, the formulation of policy, and tailored interventions. This review systematically maps existing published research regarding CM definitions and measurements, as well as related laws in China. A scoping review was conducted to explore the relevant published literature in English and Chinese from eight databases and legal documents between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2025. Our review identified 34 full-text studies on perceptions of CM in China, six laws related to CM and child protection, and seven scales that are frequently used to assess CM. Five characteristics emerged that explain CM operational definitions in China: frequency, outcome, intention, blood relationship, and perpetrator. Most scales focus solely on abusive behaviors, neglecting multiple characteristics, which may lead to culturally biased interpretations. Discrepancies exist between the CM operationalization framework and its measurement in China. The interpretation of CM results should be approached with caution, considering the operational definitions applicable to different cultural contexts.

Trauma Violence & Abuse
Peking University (CN), New York University Shanghai (CN), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US), University of Global Health Equity (RW), East China Normal University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.