Visualising the intellectual landscape of building fire risk assessment research: A bibliometric analysis from 1996 to 2024

• 691 WoS publications on building fire risk assessment over 30 years were analyzed. • Yearly publications show a fluctuating rise and distinct multidisciplinary character. • Collaboration networks lack breadth, with a quantity-impact imbalance in output. • Four major research themes and three persistent hotspots are identified. • Research fronts evolve in three phases, driven by technological advancements. The frequent occurrence of building fires in recent years has resulted in elevated casualties and property losses, underscoring the significance of building fire risk assessment research. The present study conducted a bibliometric analysis of relevant literature from the Web of Science database (1996-2024) using VOSviewer and CiteSpace to systematically exploring research progress, collaborative features and cutting-edge trends in this field. The results show that the number of publications has fluctuated upward over the past three decades, and the publications are multidisciplinary, dominated by engineering and materials science. China’s preeminence in terms of publication volume is indisputable, while England and the United States have assumed pivotal roles as transnational collaboration hubs. The institutional collaboration is regionally clustered, in which the University of California System performs a bridging role internationally. Authors have formed several close but isolated research groups, with minimal cross-team collaboration. The research themes encompass modelling analysis, building safety, fire protection design and risk management, and hotspots focusing on fire mechanism, innovation of assessment methods and risk prevention and control. The research frontier has undergone a transition from the initial phases of system construction and theoretical integration to the mid-term safety design and multi-hazard coupling stages, and further extended to emerging fields such as artificial intelligence, high-precision simulation, and full-cycle fire protection design. This study employs a multi-dimensional perspective to reveal the evolution of the knowledge structure and development potential in this field, providing a scientific basis for subsequent research on building fire risk assessment, prevention, and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110142
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualising the intellectual landscape of building fire risk assessment research: A bibliometric analysis from 1996 to 2024

Khalina Abdan, Mahirah Jahari, Anas Mohd Mustafah, Noorhazlinda Abd Rahman et al.
Results in Engineering
Fire dynamics and safety research
article

Visualising the intellectual landscape of building fire risk assessment research: A bibliometric analysis from 1996 to 2024

Khalina Abdan, Mahirah Jahari, Anas Mohd Mustafah, Noorhazlinda Abd Rahman, Mohd Zahirasri Mohd Tohir, Xinwei Feng, Xiao Chang
article en

Abstract

• 691 WoS publications on building fire risk assessment over 30 years were analyzed. • Yearly publications show a fluctuating rise and distinct multidisciplinary character. • Collaboration networks lack breadth, with a quantity-impact imbalance in output. • Four major research themes and three persistent hotspots are identified. • Research fronts evolve in three phases, driven by technological advancements. The frequent occurrence of building fires in recent years has resulted in elevated casualties and property losses, underscoring the significance of building fire risk assessment research. The present study conducted a bibliometric analysis of relevant literature from the Web of Science database (1996-2024) using VOSviewer and CiteSpace to systematically exploring research progress, collaborative features and cutting-edge trends in this field. The results show that the number of publications has fluctuated upward over the past three decades, and the publications are multidisciplinary, dominated by engineering and materials science. China’s preeminence in terms of publication volume is indisputable, while England and the United States have assumed pivotal roles as transnational collaboration hubs. The institutional collaboration is regionally clustered, in which the University of California System performs a bridging role internationally. Authors have formed several close but isolated research groups, with minimal cross-team collaboration. The research themes encompass modelling analysis, building safety, fire protection design and risk management, and hotspots focusing on fire mechanism, innovation of assessment methods and risk prevention and control. The research frontier has undergone a transition from the initial phases of system construction and theoretical integration to the mid-term safety design and multi-hazard coupling stages, and further extended to emerging fields such as artificial intelligence, high-precision simulation, and full-cycle fire protection design. This study employs a multi-dimensional perspective to reveal the evolution of the knowledge structure and development potential in this field, providing a scientific basis for subsequent research on building fire risk assessment, prevention, and management.

Results in EngineeringVol. 30
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY), Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Taiyuan Institute of Technology (CN)
Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Fire dynamics and safety research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.