An Acta Orthopaedica educational article: Treatment of adult patients with a humeral shaft fracture

This educational review outlines the core principles of humeral shaft fracture (HSF) management and is designed for orthopedic trainees, general orthopedic surgeons, emergency physicians, and allied health professionals who participate in the acute or postoperative care of patients with HSFs. The content integrates the authors' expert opinion with the current evidence. Humeral shaft fractures account for 1-3% of adult fractures, most often resulting from low-energy falls in older adults or high-energy trauma in younger patients. Although open fractures and neurovascular injuries are rare, primary radial nerve palsy (RNP) occurs in about 10% of cases. Diagnosis relies primarily on clinical evaluation and standard radiographs, with CT or MRI reserved for complex or pathological cases. Functional bracing has traditionally been the mainstay of nonsurgical treatment, achieving good long-term results but with nonunion rates up to 25%. Surgical fixation methods-including open reduction and internal fixation, minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, and intramedullary nailing-allow earlier mobilization and more predictable fracture union but carry risks of iatrogenic RNP and infection. Management of primary RNP remains largely nonsurgical, with over 90% recovering spontaneously. Nonunion is frequently symptomatic and managed most often with compression plating. Surgery offers faster early recovery and lower nonunion rates, although long-term outcomes converge with successful bracing. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest surgery may be more economical when productivity loss is considered, particularly for working-age patients. Optimal treatment selection depends on patient age, activity level, fracture characteristics, and patient preference, emphasizing shared decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Orthopaedica
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.45597
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Acta Orthopaedica educational article: Treatment of adult patients with a humeral shaft fracture

Olof Wolf, Maire Ratasvuori, Tuomas Lähdeoja, Lasse Rämö et al.
Acta Orthopaedica
Bone fractures and treatments
article

An Acta Orthopaedica educational article: Treatment of adult patients with a humeral shaft fracture

Olof Wolf, Maire Ratasvuori, Tuomas Lähdeoja, Lasse Rämö, Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen, William M. Oliver, Dennis Karimi, Antti P Launonen, Bjarke Viberg, Thomas Ibounig
article en

Abstract

This educational review outlines the core principles of humeral shaft fracture (HSF) management and is designed for orthopedic trainees, general orthopedic surgeons, emergency physicians, and allied health professionals who participate in the acute or postoperative care of patients with HSFs. The content integrates the authors' expert opinion with the current evidence. Humeral shaft fractures account for 1-3% of adult fractures, most often resulting from low-energy falls in older adults or high-energy trauma in younger patients. Although open fractures and neurovascular injuries are rare, primary radial nerve palsy (RNP) occurs in about 10% of cases. Diagnosis relies primarily on clinical evaluation and standard radiographs, with CT or MRI reserved for complex or pathological cases. Functional bracing has traditionally been the mainstay of nonsurgical treatment, achieving good long-term results but with nonunion rates up to 25%. Surgical fixation methods-including open reduction and internal fixation, minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, and intramedullary nailing-allow earlier mobilization and more predictable fracture union but carry risks of iatrogenic RNP and infection. Management of primary RNP remains largely nonsurgical, with over 90% recovering spontaneously. Nonunion is frequently symptomatic and managed most often with compression plating. Surgery offers faster early recovery and lower nonunion rates, although long-term outcomes converge with successful bracing. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest surgery may be more economical when productivity loss is considered, particularly for working-age patients. Optimal treatment selection depends on patient age, activity level, fracture characteristics, and patient preference, emphasizing shared decision-making.

Acta OrthopaedicaVol. 97
University of Helsinki (FI), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Odense University Hospital (DK), Hvidovre Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), South Karelia Central Hospital (FI), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Wentworth Douglass Hospital (US), Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.