Generative AI in Precision Nutrition: A Review of Current Developments and Future Directions

<b>Background:</b> Precision nutrition (PN) aims to personalize dietary guidance by accounting for inter-individual variability across biological, metabolic, lifestyle, and environmental factors influencing nutritional needs and health outcomes. While traditional Artificial Intelligence (AI) has advanced nutritional research through systems like automated dietary assessment, these models often operate rigidly. Generative AI (GenAI) introduces the capacity for adaptive interventions for enhanced PN. However, the scope and maturity of its applications remain insufficiently characterized. <b>Objective:</b> This review examined original works applying GenAI in PN, focusing on application, methodology, and limitations. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ACM Digital Library, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria focused on original works deploying GenAI models in PN contexts. Included works were further formally assessed based on data used, validation, transparency, bias, and security and privacy. <b>Results:</b> 21 eligible studies were identified, all published after 2024. The literature indicated a surge in large language model-based systems for personalized dietary recommendations, followed by applications in data foundation building and food effect understanding. A recurrent limitation was questionable evaluation on synthetic data and hallucinations, necessitating a human-expert-in-the-loop, especially in high-stakes clinical settings. Additionally, only 4 of 21 reviewed studies incorporated biological content or biological inputs, and fewer approached biologically grounded PN within implemented personalization workflows using metabolic and/or genomic variables. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although GenAI research in PN is expanding rapidly, most applications remain personalized at a user-preference level rather than including biological determinants. The need for standardized reporting, stronger genome-informed modeling, and consistent human-in-the-loop validation protocols is further highlighted to advance towards holistic PN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18060938
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in Precision Nutrition: A Review of Current Developments and Future Directions

Lubnaa Abdur Rahman, Maria Kafyra, Ioannis Papathanail, Ioanna Panagiota Kalafati et al.
Nutrients
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
article

Generative AI in Precision Nutrition: A Review of Current Developments and Future Directions

Lubnaa Abdur Rahman, Maria Kafyra, Ioannis Papathanail, Ioanna Panagiota Kalafati, Vasileios Dedousis, Stavroula Georgia Mougiakakou, Rooholla Poursoleymani
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Precision nutrition (PN) aims to personalize dietary guidance by accounting for inter-individual variability across biological, metabolic, lifestyle, and environmental factors influencing nutritional needs and health outcomes. While traditional Artificial Intelligence (AI) has advanced nutritional research through systems like automated dietary assessment, these models often operate rigidly. Generative AI (GenAI) introduces the capacity for adaptive interventions for enhanced PN. However, the scope and maturity of its applications remain insufficiently characterized. <b>Objective:</b> This review examined original works applying GenAI in PN, focusing on application, methodology, and limitations. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ACM Digital Library, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria focused on original works deploying GenAI models in PN contexts. Included works were further formally assessed based on data used, validation, transparency, bias, and security and privacy. <b>Results:</b> 21 eligible studies were identified, all published after 2024. The literature indicated a surge in large language model-based systems for personalized dietary recommendations, followed by applications in data foundation building and food effect understanding. A recurrent limitation was questionable evaluation on synthetic data and hallucinations, necessitating a human-expert-in-the-loop, especially in high-stakes clinical settings. Additionally, only 4 of 21 reviewed studies incorporated biological content or biological inputs, and fewer approached biologically grounded PN within implemented personalization workflows using metabolic and/or genomic variables. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although GenAI research in PN is expanding rapidly, most applications remain personalized at a user-preference level rather than including biological determinants. The need for standardized reporting, stronger genome-informed modeling, and consistent human-in-the-loop validation protocols is further highlighted to advance towards holistic PN.

NutrientsVol. 18(6)
University of Bern (CH), Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.