Assessing content validity of learner milestones for decolonial global health education: A modified Delphi study

The field of global health is rooted in colonialism, and many global health partnerships perpetuate colonial power dynamics. To change this, knowledge and praxis in decoloniality must become a fundamental part of global health education and practice. Since there are no current tools in global health education specifically focusing on decolonial praxis, we drew on existing literature to develop a tool designed to measure a learner clinician's progression in attitudes and practice regarding health equity and decoloniality. Milestones were defined across four learner levels: pre-contemplative, contemplative, critical action, and transformative action. Both a self-assessment and an educator assessment of a learner version of the tool were created. We conducted a modified Delphi process using an online survey to create consensus on 20 learner milestone definitions for this assessment tool. To craft a diverse Delphi panel, we invited 11 academic clinicians who have published at least one peer-reviewed publication surrounding decoloniality; six of whom were primarily based in a resource-denied setting, five of whom were primarily based in a resource-advantaged setting, and with at least one participant from sub-Saharan Africa, Central and South America, and Southeast Asia. Consensus was defined as >75% of panelists accepting the definition. After three rounds, Delphi members had reached consensus on all (20/20) items for both the self-assessment and educator assessment versions of the tool. Themes of changes to the tool included better reflecting the mutual learning that occurs between global partners, providing more observable behaviors for assessment, and incorporating transformative learning principles into the milestones, which predominantly utilize a behaviorist framework. This study provides consensus on milestone definitions for a learner assessment tool for clinician trainees in global health that allows learners and educators to engage in self-reflection and progression in decolonial attitudes and practice during an educational process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005016
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing content validity of learner milestones for decolonial global health education: A modified Delphi study

Tamara N. Fitzgerald, Isaac Iyinoluwa Olufadewa, Jeffrey G. Edwards, Leah Ratner et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Health and Surgery
article

Assessing content validity of learner milestones for decolonial global health education: A modified Delphi study

Tamara N. Fitzgerald, Isaac Iyinoluwa Olufadewa, Jeffrey G. Edwards, Leah Ratner, Eliut Rivera-Segarra, Mariam E. Dogar, Ans Irfan, Elisha Siegel, Christiana M. Russ, Priscilla Gonzalez, Barnabas Alayande, Marta Williams, Jared Gabriel Dela Rosa
article en

Abstract

The field of global health is rooted in colonialism, and many global health partnerships perpetuate colonial power dynamics. To change this, knowledge and praxis in decoloniality must become a fundamental part of global health education and practice. Since there are no current tools in global health education specifically focusing on decolonial praxis, we drew on existing literature to develop a tool designed to measure a learner clinician's progression in attitudes and practice regarding health equity and decoloniality. Milestones were defined across four learner levels: pre-contemplative, contemplative, critical action, and transformative action. Both a self-assessment and an educator assessment of a learner version of the tool were created. We conducted a modified Delphi process using an online survey to create consensus on 20 learner milestone definitions for this assessment tool. To craft a diverse Delphi panel, we invited 11 academic clinicians who have published at least one peer-reviewed publication surrounding decoloniality; six of whom were primarily based in a resource-denied setting, five of whom were primarily based in a resource-advantaged setting, and with at least one participant from sub-Saharan Africa, Central and South America, and Southeast Asia. Consensus was defined as >75% of panelists accepting the definition. After three rounds, Delphi members had reached consensus on all (20/20) items for both the self-assessment and educator assessment versions of the tool. Themes of changes to the tool included better reflecting the mutual learning that occurs between global partners, providing more observable behaviors for assessment, and incorporating transformative learning principles into the milestones, which predominantly utilize a behaviorist framework. This study provides consensus on milestone definitions for a learner assessment tool for clinician trainees in global health that allows learners and educators to engage in self-reflection and progression in decolonial attitudes and practice during an educational process.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(3)
University of Southern California (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Ponce Health Sciences University (PR), Duke University (US), University of Global Health Equity (RW), University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.