Primary care consultation modality and acute mental health service use in adults

Abstract The adoption of remote consultations following the COVID-19 pandemic raised questions about the impact on patient outcomes. Here we assess the relationship between the proportion of remote consultations in primary care and subsequent acute mental health service use, specifically emergency contacts with mental health liaison teams, psychiatric hospital admissions, inpatient bed-days and compulsory admissions under the Mental Health Act. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with depression, anxiety or severe mental illness using the Clinical Record Interactive Search platform, which accesses pseudonymized electronic patient records from a large London mental healthcare provider. These records were linked to primary care consultation data from the Lambeth DataNet platform. The study period covered 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021, spanning prepandemic and pandemic phases. Associations were estimated using generalized estimating equations with a negative binomial distribution to account for overdispersion and clustering by general practice. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to address missing data. The analytic cohort included 107,993 patients. A higher proportion of remote consultations was associated with a modest increase in the rate of emergency contacts with mental health liaison teams (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.07 per 10-percentage-point increase in remote care). By contrast, no significant associations were found between consultation modality and psychiatric hospital admissions (IRR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.07), inpatient bed-days (IRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95–1.09) or compulsory admissions (IRR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99–1.07). Patients who used remote primary care consultations more frequently, particularly those delivered via telephone, had more emergency contacts with mental health liaison teams, potentially reflecting precautionary referrals or reverse causality. However, remote consulting was not associated with increased psychiatric admissions, longer hospital stays or compulsory detentions, suggesting it is not linked to clinical deterioration requiring hospitalizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Mental Health
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-026-00605-9
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary care consultation modality and acute mental health service use in adults

Liliana Hidalgo-Padilla, Eoin Gogarty, Marta Costa, Robert Stewart et al.
Nature Mental Health
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Primary care consultation modality and acute mental health service use in adults

Liliana Hidalgo-Padilla, Eoin Gogarty, Marta Costa, Robert Stewart, Reese Sarkodie, Fiona Gaughran
article en

Abstract

Abstract The adoption of remote consultations following the COVID-19 pandemic raised questions about the impact on patient outcomes. Here we assess the relationship between the proportion of remote consultations in primary care and subsequent acute mental health service use, specifically emergency contacts with mental health liaison teams, psychiatric hospital admissions, inpatient bed-days and compulsory admissions under the Mental Health Act. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with depression, anxiety or severe mental illness using the Clinical Record Interactive Search platform, which accesses pseudonymized electronic patient records from a large London mental healthcare provider. These records were linked to primary care consultation data from the Lambeth DataNet platform. The study period covered 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021, spanning prepandemic and pandemic phases. Associations were estimated using generalized estimating equations with a negative binomial distribution to account for overdispersion and clustering by general practice. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to address missing data. The analytic cohort included 107,993 patients. A higher proportion of remote consultations was associated with a modest increase in the rate of emergency contacts with mental health liaison teams (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.07 per 10-percentage-point increase in remote care). By contrast, no significant associations were found between consultation modality and psychiatric hospital admissions (IRR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.07), inpatient bed-days (IRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95–1.09) or compulsory admissions (IRR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99–1.07). Patients who used remote primary care consultations more frequently, particularly those delivered via telephone, had more emergency contacts with mental health liaison teams, potentially reflecting precautionary referrals or reverse causality. However, remote consulting was not associated with increased psychiatric admissions, longer hospital stays or compulsory detentions, suggesting it is not linked to clinical deterioration requiring hospitalizations.

Nature Mental Health
King's College London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.