Neoliberal Growth Regimes and Labour: Some Core Concerns

Over the past few decades, since the early 1970s, a laissez-faire ideology has acquired hegemonic dominance, which we term ‘growth fundamentalism’. Within the alternative political economy tradition, this period is viewed as a neoliberal macroeconomic policy regime in which the link between growth and any possibility of improving the well-being of the majority of the population has been virtually severed. In short, the claim that focusing solely on growth has any theoretical or empirical validity is unfounded. The idea that growth alone is the panacea for achieving desirable multidimensional indicators of well-being is nothing more than ‘growth fundamentalism’, and hence, a flawed concept. An alternative conceptual framework presents that addressing inequality can also ensure economic growth, while the reverse has always been highly questionable. JEL Codes: P11, P16, P21, D63, F43

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Indian Economic Journal
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662261429376
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoliberal Growth Regimes and Labour: Some Core Concerns

Manish Kumar, Praveen Jha
The Indian Economic Journal
Economic Theory and Policy
article

Neoliberal Growth Regimes and Labour: Some Core Concerns

Manish Kumar, Praveen Jha
article en

Abstract

Over the past few decades, since the early 1970s, a laissez-faire ideology has acquired hegemonic dominance, which we term ‘growth fundamentalism’. Within the alternative political economy tradition, this period is viewed as a neoliberal macroeconomic policy regime in which the link between growth and any possibility of improving the well-being of the majority of the population has been virtually severed. In short, the claim that focusing solely on growth has any theoretical or empirical validity is unfounded. The idea that growth alone is the panacea for achieving desirable multidimensional indicators of well-being is nothing more than ‘growth fundamentalism’, and hence, a flawed concept. An alternative conceptual framework presents that addressing inequality can also ensure economic growth, while the reverse has always been highly questionable. JEL Codes: P11, P16, P21, D63, F43

The Indian Economic Journal
University of Delhi (IN), Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Economic Theory and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.