The Impermanence of Death: Tomb Reopening and Reuse in Central Apulia in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BCE

This article discusses evidence from Central Apulian necropoleis between the sixth and fourth centuries BCE to illustrate three forms of post-depositional interactions with the dead: tomb reopening for goods retrieval, the construction of residential buildings above preexisting graves, and repeated reuses of ostensibly single-deposition tombs. These practices have often been explained away as a matter of convenience or lack of piety. I argue that although they might appear destructive, they did not have necessarily negative connotations. By repeatedly engaging with the physical remains of predeceased members of their communities, the inhabitants of this region were able to blur the boundaries between past generations and their present, alternately rejecting, incorporating, and reinventing shared memories. Understanding these behaviors goes beyond the study of funerary practices, as they can be used also to expand our limited knowledge of the structures of the community (e.g., families, clans, and other forms of kin groups) and various aspects of religion, such as ancestor worship.1 Content warning: Readers are advised that this article contains a photograph of human remains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Archaeology
Published
2026-03-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/739813
Primary Topic
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impermanence of Death: Tomb Reopening and Reuse in Central Apulia in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BCE

Bice Peruzzi
American Journal of Archaeology
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
article

The Impermanence of Death: Tomb Reopening and Reuse in Central Apulia in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BCE

Bice Peruzzi
article en

Abstract

This article discusses evidence from Central Apulian necropoleis between the sixth and fourth centuries BCE to illustrate three forms of post-depositional interactions with the dead: tomb reopening for goods retrieval, the construction of residential buildings above preexisting graves, and repeated reuses of ostensibly single-deposition tombs. These practices have often been explained away as a matter of convenience or lack of piety. I argue that although they might appear destructive, they did not have necessarily negative connotations. By repeatedly engaging with the physical remains of predeceased members of their communities, the inhabitants of this region were able to blur the boundaries between past generations and their present, alternately rejecting, incorporating, and reinventing shared memories. Understanding these behaviors goes beyond the study of funerary practices, as they can be used also to expand our limited knowledge of the structures of the community (e.g., families, clans, and other forms of kin groups) and various aspects of religion, such as ancestor worship.1 Content warning: Readers are advised that this article contains a photograph of human remains.

American Journal of ArchaeologyVol. 130(2)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.